Venoarterial (VA) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in the past few decades has become the mainstay of circulatory support for the treatment of refractory cardiogenic shock. There has been a resurgence of interest in ECMO with exponential increase in its use in adult population. 1 Technological improvements in cannulae, membrane oxygenators, pumps, circuits, portability, and ease of deployment have undoubtedly contributed to these trends. This has made possible the movement of ECMO out of the operating rooms and intensive care units into cardiac catheterization laboratories where interventional cardiologists are becoming more comfortable in initiating ECMO support for medically unmanageable cardiogenic shock complicated by acute myocardial infarction (AMI).In the manuscript by Truby et al., 2 the authors present contemporary results of VA ECMO in 179 patients at their center supported between 2007 and 2013. Overall results in this contemporary cohort closely reflects our experience with this technology. In a diverse patient population consisting primarily of postcardiotomy shock, AMI, primary graft failure after heart transplantation, and acute decompensated heart failure, they have achieved a respectable survival to hospital discharge close to 40%. The survival data are impressive when one considers that 30% of patients were undergoing active cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) at the time of initiation of treatment. This puts into perspective that without ECMO, mortality was almost certain in all these patients. More importantly the mean duration of support in survivors was 3.6 days, and close to 30% were transitioned to other shortterm device (CentriMag, Thoratec Corp., Pleasanton, CA; n = 40) or durable left ventricular assist device (LVAD; n = 10). Expeditious restoration of circulatory and pulmonary support offers the greatest advantage of ECMO and "buys" time to sort out other issues including metabolic derangements, potential for recovery, eligibility for advanced therapies such as LVAD, or decision to withdraw support because of futility of further care. 3 The early determination of the prognosis of patients and the strategy to bridge select patients from ECMO to another device should be commended given the limitations and complications associated with prolonged ECMO support.Peripheral support applies constant afterload on the failing heart. In this report, 8.9% of patients developed left ventricle (LV) distention, which is likely an underestimate. Monitoring of LV distention by echocardiography is not always feasible at all times unless continuous imaging is available. Even if available, the LV geometry may not necessarily correlate with left ventricular enddiastolic pressure (LVEDP), and pulmonary complications may evolve before being clinically detectable. The use of intra-aortic balloon pump with VA ECMO was underused as the combination has a favorable effect on LV dimension and decreases pulmonary artery pressure. 4 Limb ischemia (14% in this study) developed despite continuous bedside sur...