1993
DOI: 10.1161/01.hyp.22.1.67
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intra-arterial infusion of insulin attenuates vasoreactivity in human forearm.

Abstract: Hyperinsulinemia may contribute to the development of hypertension. The aim of the present study was to determine whether hyperinsulinemia modulates vascular reactivity to phenylephrine or angiotensin II. In 10 young, healthy volunteers, the left brachial artery was cannulated for drug infusion and direct measurements of arterial pressure. We measured forearm blood flow by a strain-gauge plethysmograph while infusing phenylephrine (0.2, 0.8, and 2.4 /ig/min) and angiotensin II (5,10, and 20 ng/min) locally int… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

5
39
2

Year Published

1994
1994
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
5
39
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The stimulation of 45Ca2' efflux by 5-HT was expected because 5-HT stimulates Ca2' release from intracellular stores (Fig 1, bottom). The finding that insulin had no effect on 45Ca2' efflux indicates that insulin does not stimulate sarcolemmal Ca2' efflux and thus supports the data in Fig 1. To determine the effects of insulin on the release of Ca2' from intracellular stores, we studied saponinskinned cells.23 24 To verify that saponin effectively increased sarcolemmal Ca2' permeability in these cells, the uptake of 45Ca21 was assayed by cells that had been preincubated with or without 20 ,g/mL saponin for 5 minutes. As shown in Fig 4, saponin increased 45Ca2+ uptake, indicating that this agent increased sarcolemmal Ca24 permeability or increased Ca2' binding by the sarcolemma and/or intracellular sites.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stimulation of 45Ca2' efflux by 5-HT was expected because 5-HT stimulates Ca2' release from intracellular stores (Fig 1, bottom). The finding that insulin had no effect on 45Ca2' efflux indicates that insulin does not stimulate sarcolemmal Ca2' efflux and thus supports the data in Fig 1. To determine the effects of insulin on the release of Ca2' from intracellular stores, we studied saponinskinned cells.23 24 To verify that saponin effectively increased sarcolemmal Ca2' permeability in these cells, the uptake of 45Ca21 was assayed by cells that had been preincubated with or without 20 ,g/mL saponin for 5 minutes. As shown in Fig 4, saponin increased 45Ca2+ uptake, indicating that this agent increased sarcolemmal Ca24 permeability or increased Ca2' binding by the sarcolemma and/or intracellular sites.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas some authors have found an increase in blood flow in response to local insulin administration [6,7], others have not [8][9][10]. Based on the latter findings it has been concluded that the insulin-induced vasodilatation is centrally mediated [11,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, acute increases in plasma insulin within the physiological range have shown conflicting responses in forearm vasodilation [21,22], but with no increase in blood pressure despite increased sympathetic neural outflow [21] and a marked increase in forearm noradrenaline release [22]. Local hyperinsulinaemia (using a brachial artery infusion) attenuates neurogenic vasoconstriction induced by lower body negative pressure [23] and also the pharmacological vasoconstriction of phenylephrine and angiotensin II [24]. Most studies have shown no changes in baseline forearm vascular resistance detected during intra-arterial insulin infusion [23][24][25][26] suggesting that a direct vasodilatory effect of insulin is unlikely.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Local hyperinsulinaemia (using a brachial artery infusion) attenuates neurogenic vasoconstriction induced by lower body negative pressure [23] and also the pharmacological vasoconstriction of phenylephrine and angiotensin II [24]. Most studies have shown no changes in baseline forearm vascular resistance detected during intra-arterial insulin infusion [23][24][25][26] suggesting that a direct vasodilatory effect of insulin is unlikely.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%