2012
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2066738
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intra-Daily Volatility Spillovers between the US and German Stock Markets

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other channels of the informational transmission are described in Bekaert, Ehrmann, Fratzscher, and Mehl (2012), where, in particular, the authors provide a strong support for the validity of the "wake-up call" hypothesis, which states that a local crisis in one market may prompt investors to reexamine their views on the vulnerability of other market segments, which in turn may cause spreading of the local shock to other markets. Clustering of extreme events may also be caused by intra-day volatility spillovers both within one market and across different markets, see Golosnoy, Gribisch, and Liesenfeld (2012) for a recent study of this topic. In general, it is not clear whether the joint exceedances are triggered by a jump in one component or just caused by a common factor -both scenarios occur in financial markets and are interesting to analyze.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other channels of the informational transmission are described in Bekaert, Ehrmann, Fratzscher, and Mehl (2012), where, in particular, the authors provide a strong support for the validity of the "wake-up call" hypothesis, which states that a local crisis in one market may prompt investors to reexamine their views on the vulnerability of other market segments, which in turn may cause spreading of the local shock to other markets. Clustering of extreme events may also be caused by intra-day volatility spillovers both within one market and across different markets, see Golosnoy, Gribisch, and Liesenfeld (2012) for a recent study of this topic. In general, it is not clear whether the joint exceedances are triggered by a jump in one component or just caused by a common factor -both scenarios occur in financial markets and are interesting to analyze.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clements et al (2015) use high-frequency (10-minute) futures data on the dollar index, Treasury bond, and S&P500 equity index during 2003-2013 and find that meteor shower and heat wave effects are equally significant. Golosnoy et al (2012),using intra-day data of the Dow Jones and DAX, find evidence of significant short-term volatility spillover within both markets, as well as across the two markets (meteor shower effect). They find that the spillover effects between the U.S. and the German stock markets are of significantly longer duration and increased after the subprime crisis, which indicates substantial contagion effects.…”
Section: Volatility Transmission Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The empirical results for individual stocks suggest that these two models typically outperform the BEKK-GARCH (Engle and Kroner, 1995) and the exponentially weighted moving average (EWMA, J.P. Morgan, 1996) model in terms of the evaluation of forecasting accuracy prior to and during the subprime crisis. Golosnoy et al (2012b) modify the CAW model to test intra-daily volatility spillovers between the US and German stock markets, and their results show the existence of significant short-term volatility spillovers from one intraday period to the next and the persistence of short-term volatility shocks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%