2008
DOI: 10.1016/s0731-9053(08)23005-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intra-household allocation and consumption of WIC-approved foods: A Bayesian approach

Abstract: .The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, and marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of p r o g r a m i n f o r ma t i o n ( B r a i l l e , l a r g e p r i n t , a u d i o t a p e , e t c . ) s h o u l d c o n t a c t US D… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Much of the existing literature devoted to WIC has focused on food and nutrient intake as well as the health outcome of its target population (Rose, Habicht, and Devaney 1998, Burstein et al 2000, Oliveira and Gundersen 2000, Ponza et al 2004, Siega-Riz et al 2004, Oliveira and Chandran 2005, Ishdorj, Jensen, and Tobias 2008, Yen 2010). A handful of these studies explored these issues using large national surveys such as the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) (Cole 2001, Lin 2005, Ver Ploeg 2009), and the Continuing Survey of Food Intakes by Individuals (CSFII) (Rose, Habicht, and Devaney 1998, Oliveira and Gundersen 2000, Siega-Riz et al 2004, Oliveira and Chandran 2005, Ishdorj, Jensen, and Tobias 2008, Yen 2010).…”
Section: Background and Related Research On Wicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much of the existing literature devoted to WIC has focused on food and nutrient intake as well as the health outcome of its target population (Rose, Habicht, and Devaney 1998, Burstein et al 2000, Oliveira and Gundersen 2000, Ponza et al 2004, Siega-Riz et al 2004, Oliveira and Chandran 2005, Ishdorj, Jensen, and Tobias 2008, Yen 2010). A handful of these studies explored these issues using large national surveys such as the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) (Cole 2001, Lin 2005, Ver Ploeg 2009), and the Continuing Survey of Food Intakes by Individuals (CSFII) (Rose, Habicht, and Devaney 1998, Oliveira and Gundersen 2000, Siega-Riz et al 2004, Oliveira and Chandran 2005, Ishdorj, Jensen, and Tobias 2008, Yen 2010).…”
Section: Background and Related Research On Wicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For more on related posterior simulators for such models, see Koop and Poirier (1997), Chib andHamilton (2000, 2002), Tobias (2003), andChib (2007). Ishdorj et al (2008) used a similar model specification in evaluating the effectiveness of the WIC program. comprehensive and up-to-date information on the characteristics of the school meal programs, the school food policies and environments that affect the programs, the foods and nutrients in school lunches and breakfasts, and the role of school meals in students' diets (Gordon et al 2007b).…”
Section: Econometric Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study found increased calorie intake from WIC foods, but not significant differences in calorie intake overall. In 2007, researchers employing Bayesian econometrics found that WIC families harbor unobserved propensities to consume certain nutrients, and that this propensity accounts for previous findings of increased intakes [9]. Families may be selecting into WIC based on pre-existing preferences for WIC approved foods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%