2005
DOI: 10.1071/as05013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intra-Pixel Sensitivity Variation and Charge Transfer Inefficiency — Results of CCD Scans

Abstract: Abstract:The efficiency with which a charge-coupled device (CCD) detects photons depends, amongst other factors, on where within a pixel the photon hits. To explore this effect we have made detailed scans across a pixel for a front-illuminated three-phase EEV05-20 CCD using the standard astronomical B, V, R, and I colour filters. Pixel response functions and photometric sensitivity maps are derived from the scan images. Nonlinear charge transfer inefficiency (CTI) effects were observed and corrected for. The r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The origins of the asymmetric component is still not clear. With the clues given by the analysis methods in this paper, it may source from the asymmetric instrumental profile, the CTI effect (Toyozumi & Ashley 2005;Murphy et al 2012), the imperfect light injection and the envelop-background problem of the current LFCs (Milakovic et al 2017), or a mixture of all the sources above which are estimated to generate about several tens of cm s −1 uncertainties. To understand the origins of line skewness can help push down the RV precision below 1 m s −1 and keep stable for long-term scale.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The origins of the asymmetric component is still not clear. With the clues given by the analysis methods in this paper, it may source from the asymmetric instrumental profile, the CTI effect (Toyozumi & Ashley 2005;Murphy et al 2012), the imperfect light injection and the envelop-background problem of the current LFCs (Milakovic et al 2017), or a mixture of all the sources above which are estimated to generate about several tens of cm s −1 uncertainties. To understand the origins of line skewness can help push down the RV precision below 1 m s −1 and keep stable for long-term scale.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The non-uniformity can be measured with a source of light focused in a spot smaller than the pixel size. 6 The geometrical size of the spot in the described apparatus setup is smaller than the pixel size, but the PSF causes the light to be spread over several pixels. The way to restrain the PSF is to put a circular aperture in the front of the lenses.…”
Section: Intra-pixel Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the steep and peaked shape of the PSF, the subpixel sensitivity distribution had to be considered. A model similar to the one described in Toyozumi & Ashley (2005) was used. Figure 6 (middle panel) shows the assumed sub-pixel sensitivity variation for several pixels.…”
Section: Instrumentmentioning
confidence: 99%