Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2004
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd002312.pub2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intra-pleural fibrinolytic therapy versus conservative management in the treatment of parapneumonic effusions and empyema

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
53
1
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
53
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, a small-bore catheter placed with the Seldinger technique, when used for an initial thoracentesis, can be left in place for continued drainage or removed after complete drainage if the fluid is nonpurulent and the pH is 17.30. Intrapleural fibrinolytics. In 2004, The Cochrane Database Review stated that, although the evidence suggests that intrapleural fibrinolysis can be considered an important adjunctive therapy to tube drainage on the basis of evidence from randomized, controlled trials alone, routine use was not recommended for the management of CPPE and empyema, because the number of cases was too small [33]. They opined that streptokinase (no longer available as a result of a lack of market demand) and urokinase were equally efficacious and that lifethreatening complications were not reported in any of the randomized, controlled trials.…”
Section: Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, a small-bore catheter placed with the Seldinger technique, when used for an initial thoracentesis, can be left in place for continued drainage or removed after complete drainage if the fluid is nonpurulent and the pH is 17.30. Intrapleural fibrinolytics. In 2004, The Cochrane Database Review stated that, although the evidence suggests that intrapleural fibrinolysis can be considered an important adjunctive therapy to tube drainage on the basis of evidence from randomized, controlled trials alone, routine use was not recommended for the management of CPPE and empyema, because the number of cases was too small [33]. They opined that streptokinase (no longer available as a result of a lack of market demand) and urokinase were equally efficacious and that lifethreatening complications were not reported in any of the randomized, controlled trials.…”
Section: Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Streptokinase has been associated with febrile reactions but has been generally well tolerated, as reported in a number of studies. Intrapleural streptokinase, as commonly used for intrapleural administration, does not induce systemic fibrinolysis and is relatively free of hemorrhagic risk 4,5 . Intrapleural urokinase has likewise been reported to be well-tolerated 6 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, no significant radiological or functional differences were observed between the groups during the followup of more than 6 months. A meta-analysis evaluating four of these trials [4,5,9,24] concluded that although fibrinolytics reduce hospital stay and the duration of fever, and provide radiological improvements, the trials were not sufficiently powered to determine the true efficacy of fibrinolytics such as in terms of mortality and the need for surgery [6]. In the following year, a double-blind trial comparing intrapleural streptokinase with placebo in 454 adult patients with pleural infection did not show any benefit of streptokinase in terms of mortality, rate of surgery, radiological outcomes or length of hospital stay [17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%