2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00264-015-3000-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intra-prosthetic dislocation of dual-mobility cups after total hip arthroplasty: potential causes from a clinical and biomechanical perspective

Abstract: Due to the increasing popularity of dual-mobility cups in total hip arthroplasty, the understanding of which implant-specific features or tissue response may increase the risk of intra-prosthetic dislocation is of major importance for reduced revision rates by using optimized surgical techniques and implant designs.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…IPD incidence or retentive failure (RF) ranging from 1.9 to 5.2 % is reported with older-generation DM designs at a mean follow-up of four to 17 years [8,21,52,53], with the oldergeneration design at a mean follow-up of four to 17 years and 0-2.4 % at seven years with the newer-generations design [12,22,54] (Table 3). Rates appear to be dependent not only on cup design but also neck design.…”
Section: Intraprosthetic Dislocation As Results Of Pe Wearmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…IPD incidence or retentive failure (RF) ranging from 1.9 to 5.2 % is reported with older-generation DM designs at a mean follow-up of four to 17 years [8,21,52,53], with the oldergeneration design at a mean follow-up of four to 17 years and 0-2.4 % at seven years with the newer-generations design [12,22,54] (Table 3). Rates appear to be dependent not only on cup design but also neck design.…”
Section: Intraprosthetic Dislocation As Results Of Pe Wearmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although a radiostereometric method was conceived by Pineau et al [51] to measure femoral head migration inside the cup, to our knowledge, it has not been applied to measure in vivo wear. Moreover, indirect sign of poly wear is granulomatous osteolysis [52,53], which is correlated with age and activity level. Vielpeau at al.…”
Section: Wear and Its Clinical Relevance In Dm Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fabry et al 24 reviewed intraprosthetic dislocations around DM hips. One of the advantages of the DM implant is that the majority of the hip range of motion occurs at the smaller inner bearing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent times, increasing awareness of intraprosthetic dislocation is growing 21 26–28. The incidence has been reported from 0% to 5.3% 24. There is no consensus on the timing of these dislocations occurring with some series reporting early dislocations1 while other series have reported as distant as 16 years 24.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinical studies have highlighted that neck thickness and surface topography are important factors associated with poly wear of DM cups and play a role in the weakening of the retentive power of the poly liners ultimately leading to IPD of these bearing systems [7,8,[16][17][18][19]. Data on small numbers of retrievals is available [10,11,14,20], but there have been no attempts at quantifying the damage at the rim and at reporting when it is likely to occur in-vivo.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%