2020
DOI: 10.1589/rika.35.403
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intra-rater and Inter-rater Reliability of a Precordial Flexibility Test

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on previous studies and literature, The most commonly used standard of 0.7 or higher has been adopted. 18), [20][21] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on previous studies and literature, The most commonly used standard of 0.7 or higher has been adopted. 18), [20][21] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%