2022
DOI: 10.3390/atmos13020352
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intra-Seasonal and Intra-Annual Variation of the Latent Heat Flux Transfer Coefficient for a Freshwater Lake

Abstract: In the case of lakes, evaporation is one of the most significant losses of water and energy. Based on high-frequency eddy-covariance (EC) measurements between May and September of 2019, the offshore heat and water vapor exchanges are evaluated for the large (~600 km2) but shallow (~3.2 m deep) Lake Balaton (Transdanubian region, Hungary). The role of local driving forces of evaporation in different time scales (from 20 min to one month) is explored, such as water surface and air temperatures, humidity, atmosph… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is typically assumed that the value of K t is equal to that of K m , or it is calculated using Prandtl and Schmidt numbers (P r ) [42]. In future research, in addition to the momentum flux, more observational data of the heat and moisture fluxes in high winds need to be analyzed, to evaluate the characteristic of Pr to advance our understanding of the air-sea momentum and latent heat exchange under extreme wind conditions [43][44][45][46][47][48].…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is typically assumed that the value of K t is equal to that of K m , or it is calculated using Prandtl and Schmidt numbers (P r ) [42]. In future research, in addition to the momentum flux, more observational data of the heat and moisture fluxes in high winds need to be analyzed, to evaluate the characteristic of Pr to advance our understanding of the air-sea momentum and latent heat exchange under extreme wind conditions [43][44][45][46][47][48].…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the evaporation, the most popular relationships are the Penman-Monteith [17,[24][25][26] and Thornthwaite [27] ones. Possible alternatives for evaluating the evaporation are the use of the output of the numerical weather prediction (NWP) models, run over the lake basin area [19,28], as well as the remotely sensed observations [22,23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%