2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.mvr.2018.01.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intra-test and test-retest reliability of exercise oximetry in arterial claudication

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We do not have our own reliability for the exercise tests but the intra-observer coefficient of variation (CV) for the ABI at rest in our vascular laboratory is 9.4% (typical error of the estimate is 0.06) 36 . Furthermore, the reliability of the exercise tests has been previously reported by several studies: i) Van Langen et al showed that the inter-observer variability of the post-exercise ABI was 21% 37 ; ii) intra-test and test-retest reliability of exercise TcPO2 using a similar protocol that we used has been reported by Abraham and colleagues as excellent 17,18 . Indeed, the correlation coefficient between two tests was r 2 = 0.80 at distal level and intra-class correlation coefficients for the intra test-reliability and test-retest reliability were 0.920[0.846-0.967] and 0.807[0.723-0.868] respectively 17,18 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We do not have our own reliability for the exercise tests but the intra-observer coefficient of variation (CV) for the ABI at rest in our vascular laboratory is 9.4% (typical error of the estimate is 0.06) 36 . Furthermore, the reliability of the exercise tests has been previously reported by several studies: i) Van Langen et al showed that the inter-observer variability of the post-exercise ABI was 21% 37 ; ii) intra-test and test-retest reliability of exercise TcPO2 using a similar protocol that we used has been reported by Abraham and colleagues as excellent 17,18 . Indeed, the correlation coefficient between two tests was r 2 = 0.80 at distal level and intra-class correlation coefficients for the intra test-reliability and test-retest reliability were 0.920[0.846-0.967] and 0.807[0.723-0.868] respectively 17,18 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…the places of the probe were defined, the room temperature was controlled and the duration of the pre-test heating period was defined) 10 . This standardized methodology associated with the use of the delta from rest of oxygen pressure (DROP) cut-off has improved the reliability of this procedure that was confirmed by two studies 17,18 . Finally, two different teams found similar cut-off values of the DROP 8,10,12,19 8 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…1618,36,37 Although resting absolute values lack reliability, DROP results are highly reliable in intra-test and test–retest recordings. 38…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of both standing and walking on TcPO2 levels while using a liner remains unclear. For persons without an amputation, exercise TcPO2 levels differ from resting TcPO2 levels by up to 50 mmHg [46][47][48][49].…”
Section: Study Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 97%