2012
DOI: 10.1063/1.4770383
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intraband absorption in finite, inhomogeneous quantum dot stacks for intermediate band solar cells: Limitations and optimization

Abstract: We present a theoretical analysis of intraband optical transitions from the intermediate pseudo-band of confined states to the conduction band in a finite, inhomogeneous stack of self-assembled semiconductor quantum dots. The chain is modeled with an effective Hamiltonian including nearest-neighbor tunnel couplings and the absorption under illumination with both coherent (laser) and thermal radiation is discussed. We show that the absorption spectrum already for a few coupled dots differs from that of a single… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The electronic structure of a QD array is characterised by a BZ determined by the QD array dimensions (Figure ) . To calculate the electronic structure, the only modification required to the basis set is to replace the reciprocal lattice vectors in the PW expansion with those shifted because of the QD superlattice: In the case of vertically aligned QDs in a columnar QD array, |kz=eikzz|kz+Kz=ei(kz+Kz)z with L x and L y chosen to be large enough to prevent the lateral coupling; In the case of laterally aligned QDs in an in‐plane QD matrix, |k||=eik||r|||k||+K||=ei(k||+K||)·r|| where k | | = k x x ̂ + k y ŷ , K | | = K x x ̂ + K y ŷ and r | | = xx ̂ + yŷ , and L z is chosen to be large enough to prevent the vertical coupling.…”
Section: Theoretical Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The electronic structure of a QD array is characterised by a BZ determined by the QD array dimensions (Figure ) . To calculate the electronic structure, the only modification required to the basis set is to replace the reciprocal lattice vectors in the PW expansion with those shifted because of the QD superlattice: In the case of vertically aligned QDs in a columnar QD array, |kz=eikzz|kz+Kz=ei(kz+Kz)z with L x and L y chosen to be large enough to prevent the lateral coupling; In the case of laterally aligned QDs in an in‐plane QD matrix, |k||=eik||r|||k||+K||=ei(k||+K||)·r|| where k | | = k x x ̂ + k y ŷ , K | | = K x x ̂ + K y ŷ and r | | = xx ̂ + yŷ , and L z is chosen to be large enough to prevent the vertical coupling.…”
Section: Theoretical Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The QDs for which the QD and the barrier materials have no common atom are by far less investigated, despite of several advantages they offer. In the case of such QDs with type-I confinement one should mention here larger band offsets providing higher confining potentials for both, e and h. Such mixed structures may lead also to type-II confinement, with a decreased wavefunction overlap of the confined e and h. Such increased e-h spatial separation and resulting enhancement of confined carriers lifetimes is highly attractive for studies of magnetic polaron in semimagnetic QDs 1,2 or Aharonov-Bohm effect, 3 as well as for implementation of QDs in photovoltaic devices [4][5][6] . The intermediate case between type-I and type-II confinement, as in the present study, offers a chance of investigation of the impact of e and h wavefunctions overlap on properties of excitonic QDs emission.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intraband transitions, which are indispensable for the realization of QD IBSCs, have been theoretically investigated by several groups [14][15][16][17][18] for structures consisting of QDs embedded in a matrix (a QD/matrix structure), and also periodic arrays of QDs. In these structures, the electron envelope functions (wave functions) of states that lie above the matrix conduction band minimum (CBM) are expected to be affected by the presence of the QDs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%