system of coding for occurrence of a complication was found to be poor at 50% with 95% confidence interval of 39-62%.This inaccuracy resulted in gross overestimation of annual complication rates. The annual rate of complication calculation of 4.92% was reduced to 2.51% by this review process. The current system is not robust enough to allow fair comparison between sources. Derivation of cataract surgery complications from such data has resulted in misrepresentation of clinical activity of individual surgeons and surgical units. This may lead to misinformation of patients. Further, preoperative risk stratification 4 was not carried out and visual outcome not considered as the performance outcome.Several recommendations from this study have been implemented. The current practice has been altered. There is now direct input from the surgeons in the coding process, which results in better understanding of surgical procedures by the coders. An urgent need to update the codes nationally was identified, which has been followed by launch of updated version of OPCS-4.3 in April 2006.OPCS-4.3 has more appropriate and comprehensive codes in relation to cataract surgery than the older version. However, the new document does not have a complete list of complications and, therefore communication between the coders and the surgical team is still important. Further, uniformity of this system of recording of data is vital for a fair comparison to be made across the UK, NHS hospitals as well as ISTCs. 5 We believe that standardised data sets and a robust coding system, taking into account pre-operative risk stratification, could potentially provide a solution for accurate analysis and fairer comparison in the future.