2003
DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkg431
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intracellular accumulation and activity of ampicillin used as freedrug and as its phthalimidomethyl or pivaloyloxymethyl ester (pivampicillin) against Listeria monocytogenes in J774 macrophages

Abstract: This is the first demonstration that PIVA (a prodrug of ampicillin) can be used to promote ampicillin cellular accumulation and, thereby to increase ampicillin intracellular activity. PIVA could be useful for control of the intracellular multiplication of L. monocytogenes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While in some cases prodrugs offered better intestinal permeability and increased exposure after oral (Huryn et al, 2004a,b;Dyatkin et al, 2005;Venkatraman et al, 2009;Reger et al, 2010), some other attempts remained unfruitful or of limited benefit (Chiba et al, 2006a,b;Gong et al, 2006Gong et al, , 2008. As demonstrated with other ester prodrugs (Chanteux et al, 2003), the present data showed that CDP323 prodrug increased mass transfer across biologic membranes compared with the carboxylic acid derivative CT7758. In addition, CDP323 also efficiently released in vitro (Chanteux et al, 2014) and in vivo its active moiety, CT7758, as described earlier.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 45%
“…While in some cases prodrugs offered better intestinal permeability and increased exposure after oral (Huryn et al, 2004a,b;Dyatkin et al, 2005;Venkatraman et al, 2009;Reger et al, 2010), some other attempts remained unfruitful or of limited benefit (Chiba et al, 2006a,b;Gong et al, 2006Gong et al, , 2008. As demonstrated with other ester prodrugs (Chanteux et al, 2003), the present data showed that CDP323 prodrug increased mass transfer across biologic membranes compared with the carboxylic acid derivative CT7758. In addition, CDP323 also efficiently released in vitro (Chanteux et al, 2014) and in vivo its active moiety, CT7758, as described earlier.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 45%
“…For the cell infection studies, we used the general procedures described earlier for J774 cells with S. aureus ATCC 25923 (24-h model [31]) or L. monocytogenes hemolysin-producing strain EGD serotype 1/2a (5-h model [7]). For S. aureus, gentamicin (0.5 mg/ liter) was used to prevent extracellular growth in the control cultures.…”
Section: Cell Infection Studies (S Aureus and L Monocytogenes)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The persistence of oritavancin in the organism is believed to result from this high level of protein binding, analogous to the protein binding of teicoplanin (21), but it may also suggest the existence of deep storage compartments for the drug in the body. This triggered us to study the cellular pharmacokinetics and disposition of oritavancin in cultured cells by the approaches used previously to study the intracellular fates of other cationic antibiotics such as aminoglycosides (40), macrolides (4), and basic derivatives of ␤-lactam antibiotics (7,27). The mechanism of accumulation was studied by using as comparators chloroquine and azithromycin, which accumulate in lysosomes by diffusion and segregation of their protonated forms (4,12,45), and with horseradish peroxidase (HRP) and small latex beads as markers of endocytosis (26,41).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When this property was specifically looked for in cultured macrophages, however, we observed that PIVA was merely bound to the pericellular membrane, with no evidence of true intracellular penetration and lysosomal accumulation (11). Third, studies with Listeria-infected macrophages showed that macrophages incubated with low concentrations of PIVA accumulated large amounts of free ampicillin (which was active against this intracellular organism), whereas no ampicillin (and no antibacterial activity) could be seen when cells were incubated with similar concentrations of ampicillin (10).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%