2005
DOI: 10.1086/426376
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intracluster and Intragroup Entropy from Quasar Activity

Abstract: We investigate how the hierarchical merging of dark matter halos, the radiative cooling of baryons, and the energy feedback from supernovae and active galactic nuclei or quasars combine to govern the amount and the thermal state of the hot plasma pervading groups and clusters of galaxies. We show that, by itself, supernova preheating of the external gas flowing into clusters falls short of explaining the observed X-ray scaling relations of the plasma luminosity L_X or the plasma entropy K versus the X-ray temp… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
171
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

6
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(180 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
8
171
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The total kinetic power of the out-flowing gas is 1.2 × 10 44 erg s −1 (assuming an outflow rate of 700 km s −1 ), which corresponds to a few percent of the AGN bolometric luminosity, L Bol ∼ 5 × 10 45 erg s −1 (Lonsdale et al 2003) which, for a black hole mass of ∼6 × 10 8 M (Tacconi et al 2002), corresponds to 6% of the Eddington luminosity. This value of the kinetic energy is very close to that expected for a shock wave produced by radiation pressure onto the interstellar medium (Lapi et al 2005). The corresponding energy injected into the interstellar medium is ΔE ∼ f × L Bol × t AGN ∼ 5.5 × 10 57 erg, at least 4 orders of magnitude higher than the overall contribution of supernovae inferred from the observed stellar mass and age of Mrk 231 (Davies et al 2004), and even larger than the energy injected by the radio jets (Lonsdale et al 2003).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The total kinetic power of the out-flowing gas is 1.2 × 10 44 erg s −1 (assuming an outflow rate of 700 km s −1 ), which corresponds to a few percent of the AGN bolometric luminosity, L Bol ∼ 5 × 10 45 erg s −1 (Lonsdale et al 2003) which, for a black hole mass of ∼6 × 10 8 M (Tacconi et al 2002), corresponds to 6% of the Eddington luminosity. This value of the kinetic energy is very close to that expected for a shock wave produced by radiation pressure onto the interstellar medium (Lapi et al 2005). The corresponding energy injected into the interstellar medium is ΔE ∼ f × L Bol × t AGN ∼ 5.5 × 10 57 erg, at least 4 orders of magnitude higher than the overall contribution of supernovae inferred from the observed stellar mass and age of Mrk 231 (Davies et al 2004), and even larger than the energy injected by the radio jets (Lonsdale et al 2003).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…In this SAM, the AGN timescale, as well as both the AGN SMBH masses and Eddington ratios, are not free parameters, but are calculated self-consistently (the model only assumes that the accretion can proceed at most at the Eddington limit). The SAM includes a rather detailed treatment of AGN "quasar mode" feedback (Menci et al 2008), in terms of a blast wave carrying the AGN power outwards (Lapi et al 2005). The SAM predicts the comuving densities of all AGN, which are either unobscured, moderately obscured, or Compton thick.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We recall (see Appendix B in Lapi et al 2005) that the Rankine-Hugoniot conservation conditions for a standing shock give the postshock temperatures and densities in the form…”
Section: Weakening Shocks and Entropy Demisementioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the other end, much entropy is continuously produced at the virial boundary. There the ICP is shocked by the supersonic gravitational inflow of gas accreted from the environment along with the DM (see Tozzi & Norman 2001;Voit 2005;Lapi et al 2005), and is adiabatically stratified into the DM potential well.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%