1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(99)02668-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intracluster correlation of STD prevalence in a community intervention trial in Kenya

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study found that the range of ICCs from several grouprandomized trials of school-based HIV/STI/pregnancy prevention interventions in the United States was 0 to 0.15. This is similar to the range (0.003 to 0.16) found in the only other published reports of ICC estimates for HIV/STI community prevention interventions, albeit with different populations and in different settings (Feldblum et al, 1999;Pals et al, 2009). This range is slightly wider than the range of ICCs Students who reported not being sexually active in the 3 months prior to the survey were given a score of 0, allowing the entire sample to be included in the analysis (i.e., full sample), unless otherwise indicated.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…This study found that the range of ICCs from several grouprandomized trials of school-based HIV/STI/pregnancy prevention interventions in the United States was 0 to 0.15. This is similar to the range (0.003 to 0.16) found in the only other published reports of ICC estimates for HIV/STI community prevention interventions, albeit with different populations and in different settings (Feldblum et al, 1999;Pals et al, 2009). This range is slightly wider than the range of ICCs Students who reported not being sexually active in the 3 months prior to the survey were given a score of 0, allowing the entire sample to be included in the analysis (i.e., full sample), unless otherwise indicated.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…This figure is adjusted for the expected number of dropouts in the current standard of care, as it was estimated using data from the participating facilities’ ANC registration books from 2011. We calculated the minimum detectable difference between the control and the intervention arms for the primary endpoints, using methods for cluster-randomized trials[ 42 ] with unequal cluster sizes[ 40 ], with intra-cluster correlations between 0.001 and 0.030, as reported from similar cluster-randomized studies in low- and middle-income countries[ 43 , 44 ]. Primary outcome rates were taken from Tanzanian national data and studies conducted in Botswana[ 45 ] and Zimbabwe[ 46 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Feldblum et al (1999) reported ICCs for the prevalence of STDs from a community-randomized trial in rural Kenya, and Hughes (2005) reported ICCs for the prevalence of STDs from a city-randomized trial in Peru. Although these ICCs may be useful to investigators planning similar trials, they are not likely to be useful in domestic trials or trials with other types of outcome variables, such as sexual risk behaviors.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%