1996
DOI: 10.1148/radiology.199.1.8633146
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intracranial aneurysms: diagnostic accuracy of MR angiography with evaluation of maximum intensity projection and source images.

Abstract: Sensitivity may improve with combined reading of nonselective MIP and source images.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
25
2

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
25
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The overall frequency in the general population ranges from 0.2% to 9% (mean frequency, about 5%) in autopsy studies 7,8) . However, the likelihood of detection of unruptured aneurysms has increased with improved imaging techniques, such as 3D computed tomography angiography and magnetic resonance angiography 6,11,12) . The effect of rupture of an intracranial aneurysms are devastating, and surgical morbidity and mortality remain as high as 60% 16) despite recent advances in the intensive management of patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) 5) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The overall frequency in the general population ranges from 0.2% to 9% (mean frequency, about 5%) in autopsy studies 7,8) . However, the likelihood of detection of unruptured aneurysms has increased with improved imaging techniques, such as 3D computed tomography angiography and magnetic resonance angiography 6,11,12) . The effect of rupture of an intracranial aneurysms are devastating, and surgical morbidity and mortality remain as high as 60% 16) despite recent advances in the intensive management of patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) 5) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,5,6 Despite the continuing sophistication of the imaging technique, 1 important cause of the limited sensitivity of MRA is the detection failures of radiologists. Interpretation of both source and reconstructed images is recommended to achieve good sensitivity of MRA, [7][8][9] but detecting relatively small lesions is a timeconsuming and difficult task.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vernooij and colleagues found an incidence of 1.8% in 2000 scanned people, which is equal to the prevalence estimated from the ISUIA study [Vernooij et al 2007;International Study of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms Investigators, 1998]. MRA sensitivity is estimated to be as high as >95% for aneurysms >6 mm, with rapidly decreasing sensitivity for the reduction of aneurysmal size (60% sensitivity for aneurysms <5 mm) [Atlas et al 1997;Korogi et al 1996]. Local resolution of tomographic imaging techniques does not grant assured detection of aneurysms smaller than 3 mm in size [Forsting, 2005].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%