2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2014.08.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intracranial electroencephalography with subdural and/or depth electrodes in children with epilepsy: Techniques, complications, and outcomes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The certain proportion of TLE patients appears to be resistant to antiepileptic drugs and is referred to the several surgical treatments of brain regions [6,7]. The invasive intracranial EEG is supposed to be useful for the surgical localization of epileptic foci in patients with intractable epilepsy; the data on safety and surgical outcome with this technique are still inadequate [8][9][10][11]. The ample evidences of advanced research using multimodal combinational non-invasive neuroimaging techniques like MRI, MRS, f-MRI, FDG-PET, SPECT, and MEG have revealed that most of the cases of TLE patients are accompanied by pathological changes in brain structure and function network, including cortical and subcortical (hippocampus and parahippocampus) structures [12][13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The certain proportion of TLE patients appears to be resistant to antiepileptic drugs and is referred to the several surgical treatments of brain regions [6,7]. The invasive intracranial EEG is supposed to be useful for the surgical localization of epileptic foci in patients with intractable epilepsy; the data on safety and surgical outcome with this technique are still inadequate [8][9][10][11]. The ample evidences of advanced research using multimodal combinational non-invasive neuroimaging techniques like MRI, MRS, f-MRI, FDG-PET, SPECT, and MEG have revealed that most of the cases of TLE patients are accompanied by pathological changes in brain structure and function network, including cortical and subcortical (hippocampus and parahippocampus) structures [12][13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There were 12 studies that reported on epilepsy duration, with no significant difference between SEEG patients (mean = 126.8 months ± 65.0, median = 121.8) and SDE patients (mean = 62.4 months ± 51.1, median = 51.4; Table ). Among the SEEG patients, the etiology was identified as a temporal epileptogenic focus in 42.2% of patients, tumor in 6.7% of patients, FCD1 in 39.2% of patients, FCD2 in 10.7% of patients, and lesional in 41.5% of patients .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the SEEG patients, the etiology was identified as a temporal epileptogenic focus in 42.2% of patients, 15,22,23,[26][27][28][29] tumor in 6.7% of patients, 22,23,27,28,30 FCD1 in 39.2% of patients, 16,23,27,28,[31][32][33] FCD2 in 10.7% of patients, 23,28,31 and lesional in 41.5% of patients. [15][16][17]22,23,[28][29][30][31]34 Among the SDE patients, the etiology was identified as a temporal epileptogenic focus in 40.9% of patients, 18,21,25,[35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45] tumor in 16.0% of patients, 18,20,21,…”
Section: Cohort Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, pediatric populations exhibit a different variety of seizure syndromes and disease presentations, such as higher rates of extratemporal epilepsy, which may alter postoperative outcomes due to the anatomic placement of electrodes. Invasive epilepsy monitoring has been shown to be a safe procedure in children, with generally favorable outcomes, but how their side effect profile compares to that of older populations is poorly understood, and ultimately requires further elucidation. Although age did not directly present itself as a risk factor in this study, we did find a nonsignificant trend toward decreased rates of clinically significant extraaxial collections with increased length of epilepsy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%