2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2011.04.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intracranial self-stimulation as a positive reinforcer to study impulsivity in a probability discounting paradigm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
22
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
3
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The current study utilized our new rat model of probability discounting that employs ICSS as the positive reinforcer (Rokosik and Napier, 2011) to reveal that ( ± )PPX increased discounting. We also revealed that tolerance did not develop with repeated treatments, and responding was comparable between PD-like and control rats.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The current study utilized our new rat model of probability discounting that employs ICSS as the positive reinforcer (Rokosik and Napier, 2011) to reveal that ( ± )PPX increased discounting. We also revealed that tolerance did not develop with repeated treatments, and responding was comparable between PD-like and control rats.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, ICSS allows for testing several probabilities in a randomized order, a feature that is not successfully implemented with food-reinforced discounting (St Onge et al, 2010). Randomization encourages rats to continue selecting the LR lever even at very low probabilities (in contrast to what is obtained with protocols using predictable, descending probabilities; Rokosik and Napier, 2011). Thus, we were able to detect both increases and decreases in selection of the LR lever at the lowest probabilites, where the most robust discounting often occurs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations