Intracranial T1 Weighted Hyperintense Lesions

Gupta, Neetika; Gulati, Achal; Mirza, Arif; Gulati, Vaibhav; Gulati, Parveen

doi:10.4103/mamcjms.mamcjms_34_17

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…271 This current US standard is somewhat higher than in EU Member States, where the fictitious person is deemed to have an average level of skill, whereby the hypothetical person is presumed to be merely a boring technician with good command of the basics, lacking any inventiveness of their own. 272 However, the presumed knowledge level across all three patent areas is more similar: in EU Member States, the knowledge level is described as common general knowledge with access to everything in the state of the art and in China, the person skilled in the art is presumed to have omniscient knowledge about the given technical field. 273 Finally, a similar standard for the knowledge level of a person with ordinary skill in the art is also the applicable rule in the US.…”

Section: A Differences In Patentable Subject Matter and In Patentabilitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Patent law in comparative context: Differences and similarities of patent law in the European Union, the United States and China

Hutukka

2023

Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study presents the main features of patent law in the European Union, the United States and China, with a special focus on patentability. Each patent regime is reviewed in its historical context, exploring the stages leading to the given jurisdiction's contemporary patent law. After mapping the differences and similarities of patent law in the EU, the US and China, possible reasons for the detected divergence and convergence will be explored. This study reveals that the differences in codified patent law between the EU, the US, and China are for the most part a matter of nuance and much of the convergence stems from international harmonization efforts and common historical roots as well as external pressure to convergence in patent law for mainly economic reasons. Whereas patent laws in the EU and US are more established, China's patent law has been moulded into its contemporary form only recently. Differences across the chosen jurisdictions are explained not only by cultural factors but also by underlying theoretical differences in patent doctrine and differing aims of patent protection, as well as the divide concerning the role of statutory law and case law between the common law and Romano-Germanic law.

show abstract

Section: A Differences In Patentable Subject Matter and In Patentabilitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Patent law in comparative context: Differences and similarities of patent law in the European Union, the United States and China

Hutukka

2023

Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

WITHDRAWN: Serum biomarkers of liver fibrosis identify changes in striatal metabolite levels

2024

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Intracranial T1 Weighted Hyperintense Lesions

Cited by 2 publications

References 1 publication

Patent law in comparative context: Differences and similarities of patent law in the European Union, the United States and China

Patent law in comparative context: Differences and similarities of patent law in the European Union, the United States and China

WITHDRAWN: Serum biomarkers of liver fibrosis identify changes in striatal metabolite levels

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About