1996
DOI: 10.1016/s0091-6749(96)70111-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intradermal skin tests in the diagnostic evaluation of food allergy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are no published reports of the correlation between RAST and ELISA for detection of nut-specific IgE, but our results suggest that ELISA testing is more sensitive than RAST. RAST testing for peanut-specific IgE has previously demonstrated a false-negative rate of approximately 15% [21]. Within our study, several subjects demonstrated a positive RAST score and ELISA in the absence of a clinical history.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…There are no published reports of the correlation between RAST and ELISA for detection of nut-specific IgE, but our results suggest that ELISA testing is more sensitive than RAST. RAST testing for peanut-specific IgE has previously demonstrated a false-negative rate of approximately 15% [21]. Within our study, several subjects demonstrated a positive RAST score and ELISA in the absence of a clinical history.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…If we are able to do so, then the potential exists for using intradermal tests to foods because these patients would meet the proposed criteria. 28 Finally, most patients reported the onset of symptoms within the last 2 to 3 years, challenging the notion that the incidence of adult-onset mammalian meat allergy is rare.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…32 It is important to understand that many children suffer from milk allergy, but IgE to a-Gal is distinct from the more traditional, protein-based cow' s milk allergy. a-Gal-related reactions present in older children, many of whom have no previous history of either food allergy or any allergic disease.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%