2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.02.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intrafraction motion monitoring to determine PTV margins in early stage breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant partial breast SABR

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
1
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For both prone and supine position, the average displacements we observed were smaller compared to other studies [8] , [9] , [10] , [11] , [31] . Similarly, the systematic and random intrafraction errors in prone position were much smaller than the errors reported by Mouawad et al and Lakosi et al [8] , [32] .…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For both prone and supine position, the average displacements we observed were smaller compared to other studies [8] , [9] , [10] , [11] , [31] . Similarly, the systematic and random intrafraction errors in prone position were much smaller than the errors reported by Mouawad et al and Lakosi et al [8] , [32] .…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 91%
“…For both prone and supine position, the average displacements we observed were smaller compared to other studies [8] , [9] , [10] , [11] , [31] . Similarly, the systematic and random intrafraction errors in prone position were much smaller than the errors reported by Mouawad et al and Lakosi et al [8] , [32] . Both the random and systematic intrafraction errors in supine position were also slightly smaller than those reported by Hoekstra et al, except for the systematic error in anterior-posterior which was comparable [10] .…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation