2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2022.04.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intrafraction target shift comparison using two breath-hold systems in lung stereotactic body radiotherapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean difference between values and CBCT shifts remained <0.03 mm in the vertical direction and <0.4 mm in the other five directions, and the tumor remained within the planning target volume (PTV) whenever the surface position was within SGRT tolerance. Previous studies have reported similar findings 15,16 . Sarudis et al 17 .…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 73%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The mean difference between values and CBCT shifts remained <0.03 mm in the vertical direction and <0.4 mm in the other five directions, and the tumor remained within the planning target volume (PTV) whenever the surface position was within SGRT tolerance. Previous studies have reported similar findings 15,16 . Sarudis et al 17 .…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Previous studies have reported similar findings. 15,16 Sarudis et al 17 demonstrated that SGRT is a viable approach for lung SBRT. Many studies have found the results of SGRT and CBCT are in good agreement, it can improve the radiation protection of patients and save treatment time, so as to monitor the patients' fractional movement without additional CBCT.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The correlation between the lung tumor and fiducial markers was low, with approximately 30 % of the fiducial markers obtained by comparison between lung tumor and lung volume. Therefore, the lung volume cannot completely track slight respiratory movements; however, it is effective for stable and auxiliary monitoring [16] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spatial coordinates of the fiducial marker may be displaced during SBRT, and the amplitude difference between the lung tumor and fiducial marker should be observed during SBRT [20] . In the future, we believe that more robust and dynamic tracking during SBRT may be realized by combining magnetic resonance imaging and respiration by lung volume in addition to fiducial marker [9] , [12] , [21] , [22] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%