1989
DOI: 10.1016/0168-9452(89)90124-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intrageneric asymmetric hybrids between Nicotiana plumbaginifolia and Nicotiana sylvestris obtained by ‘gamma-fusion’

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The commonly used method for selection of asymmetric somatic hybrids involves irradiation (c-, g-ray or UV light) of the donor (Imamura et al 1987;Famelaer et al 1989;Vlahova et al 1997;Forsberg et al 1998) and chemical treatment (such as the metabolic inhibitor IOA) Fig. 7a, b F 1 hybrid mature plant from the small seed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The commonly used method for selection of asymmetric somatic hybrids involves irradiation (c-, g-ray or UV light) of the donor (Imamura et al 1987;Famelaer et al 1989;Vlahova et al 1997;Forsberg et al 1998) and chemical treatment (such as the metabolic inhibitor IOA) Fig. 7a, b F 1 hybrid mature plant from the small seed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although it has been well documented that irradiation leads to a preferential loss of donor DNA , the genetic components of asymmetric hybrids were very variable. In some fusion combinations most donors DNA is retained (Famelaer et al 1989;Wolters et al 1991;McCabe et al 1993) while in others chromosomes were eliminated more thoroughly leading to highly asymmetric lines (Dudits et al 1987;Vlahova et al 1997;Xia et al 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…To date, asymmetric hybridization has met with mixed results . In general, irradiation reduced the amount of transferred donor DNA but the fraction may vary from a few traits (Dudits et al ., 1987), one or a few chromosomes (Gupta et al ., 1984 ;Bates et al ., 1987a;Melzer & O'Connell, 1992) to numerous chromosomes (Gleba et al ., 1988 ;Famelaer et al ., 1989;Sacristan et al ., 1989 ;Sjodin & Glimelius, 1989b ;Yamashita et al ., 1989 ;Wijbrandi et al ., 1990a, b, c, Wolters et al ., 1991Derks et al ., 1992) the latter result being obtained in the majority of cases . Furthermore, chromosome elimination is random and it is not possible to predict which of the chromosomes will be lost .…”
Section: Symmetric Vs Asymmetric Hybridsmentioning
confidence: 99%