2019
DOI: 10.3390/ijms20143604
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intragenic Antimicrobial Peptide Hs02 Hampers the Proliferation of Single- and Dual-Species Biofilms of P. aeruginosa and S. aureus: A Promising Agent for Mitigation of Biofilm-Associated Infections

Abstract: Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus are two major pathogens involved in a large variety of infections. Their co-occurrence in the same site of infection has been frequently reported and is linked to enhanced virulence and difficulty of treatment. Herein, the antimicrobial and antibiofilm activities of an intragenic antimicrobial peptide (IAP), named Hs02, which was uncovered from the human unconventional myosin 1H protein, were investigated against several P. aeruginosa and S. aureus strains, incl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This activity was assessed in two different ways: (i) inhibition of biofilm formation, and (ii) effect on a preformed biofilm. For evaluation of the inhibition of biofilm formation, both conjugate and parent peptide were tested at MIC and sub-inhibitory concentrations (½×MIC and at ¼×MIC) following previously established procedures [ 12 , 18 , 19 , 20 ], and the mass of biofilm formed at these concentrations was assessed through the crystal violet assay. Figure 1 shows results obtained in absence (control) and in presence of the test compounds at the three different concentrations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This activity was assessed in two different ways: (i) inhibition of biofilm formation, and (ii) effect on a preformed biofilm. For evaluation of the inhibition of biofilm formation, both conjugate and parent peptide were tested at MIC and sub-inhibitory concentrations (½×MIC and at ¼×MIC) following previously established procedures [ 12 , 18 , 19 , 20 ], and the mass of biofilm formed at these concentrations was assessed through the crystal violet assay. Figure 1 shows results obtained in absence (control) and in presence of the test compounds at the three different concentrations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eventual changes in the membrane fluidity of S. aureus ATCC 29213, S. epidermidis ATCC 12228, and C. acnes ATCC 11827 derived to the hop extract treatment were evaluated by assessing the Laurdan generalized polarization (GP exc ) as previously described by Bessa et al (2019) . Briefly, fresh colonies were inoculated in nutrient broth (NB, Liofilchem s.r.l., Roseto degli Abruzzi, Italy) to obtain an OD 600 of 0.4.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The membrane fluidity of S. mutans was measured using laurdan (AnaSpec, Fremont, CA, United States) essentially as described (Bessa et al, 2019). Laurdan is a fluorescence probe that intercalates into the membrane bilayer and displays an emission wavelength shift depending on the amount of water molecules in the membrane (Wenzel et al, 2018).…”
Section: Laurdan Membrane Fluidity Assaymentioning
confidence: 99%