ABSTRACT:The neuroprotective efficacy of hypothermia (HT) after hypoxia-ischemia (HI) falls dramatically the longer the delay in initiating HT. Knowledge is scarce regarding protective or adverse effects of HT in organs beyond the brain. In addition, the relative effectiveness of selective head cooling (SHC) and whole body cooling (WBC) has not been studied. We aimed to examine whether 24 h HT, initiated 3 h after global HI is brain-and/or organ-protective using pathology, neurology, and biochemical markers. Fifty, Յ1-dold pigs were subjected to global HI causing permanent brain injury. Animals were randomized to normothermia (NT), (T rectal ) 39.0°C, SHC Trectal 34.5°C, or WBC Trectal 34.5°C for 24 h, all followed by 48 h NT. There was no difference in injury to the brain or organs between groups. There was no gender difference in brain injury but females had significantly more organs injured [2.3 (Ϯ 1.3) [mean Ϯ SD] vs. 1.4 Ϯ (1.0)]. The postinsult decline in lactate was temperature independent. However, HT animals normalized their plasma-calcium, magnesium, and potassium significantly faster than NT. Delayed SHC or WBC, initiated 3 h after HI, does not reduce pathology in the brain nor in organs. Delayed HT improves postinsult recovery of plasma-calcium, magnesium, and potassium. There were no differences in adverse effects across groups. H ypothermia (HT) after hypoxia-ischemia (HI) is neuroprotective in experimental models across different species (1-3) with both short and long-term survival (4,5) and after a delay between insult and treatment (6,7). Recent, multicenter, randomized controlled clinical trials used two cooling methods; selective head cooling (SHC) combined with mild systemic HT to rectal temperature (T rectal ) 34.5°C (Gluckman, 2005) (8) or whole body cooling (WBC) to T rectal 33.5°C (9,10). In newborn term infants with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE), both the methods of cooling improved neurodevelopmental outcome (11). The two larger multicenter trials of HT applied to neonates (8,9) did not aim to examine organ protection after HT; however, some cardiovascular and biochemical results were reported and no differences between cooled and noncooled infants were seen. In a smaller WBC trial by Eicher et al. (10) where less mature infants (Ն35 wk gestational age) were also included and the most profound cooling (33.0°C) of the three trials was applied, the cooled infants needed longer inotropic support than the normothermic infants. Clotting times in the cooled infants were also abnormal more often.Although most piglet models produce an insult largely confined to the brain (12), our piglets are subjected to global HI allowing examination of systemic effects of treatment interventions as well as effects on the brain. Previously, we have shown that this model displays the same type of brain and organ injury and cardiovascular responses seen in the asphyxiated infant (2,13-15). It has been suggested that SHC is superior to WBC, offering greater cortical protection and fewer adverse systemic...