2019
DOI: 10.1086/698311
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intrahousehold Nutritional Inequities in Rural Bangladesh

Abstract: Utilizing a novel data source from rural Bangladesh that reports individual-level food intake, we find substantial inequities in the intra-household distribution of calories and nutrients, with household heads consuming disproportionately large shares. Importantly, these results do not appear to be driven by assumptions regarding energy requirements. Due to the inequities, aggregate household-level data misclassify the nutritional status of a large share of the population. Additionally, we find that both women… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Subsequently, the respondent was asked to report on the amounts of each meal consumed by the different household members, consumed by guests, given away or left over. The BIHS series has been widely used to estimate individual dietary intake, quality and diversity, which is a testimony to the high quality and granularity of nutritional information available in the surveys (Islam et al, 2018;Karageorgou et al, 2018;Sraboni and Quisumbing, 2018;D'Souza and Tandon, 2019). We aggregate individual level food consumption to consumption at the person-type-level to mimic the information that is available for clothing.…”
Section: Data Sources and Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, the respondent was asked to report on the amounts of each meal consumed by the different household members, consumed by guests, given away or left over. The BIHS series has been widely used to estimate individual dietary intake, quality and diversity, which is a testimony to the high quality and granularity of nutritional information available in the surveys (Islam et al, 2018;Karageorgou et al, 2018;Sraboni and Quisumbing, 2018;D'Souza and Tandon, 2019). We aggregate individual level food consumption to consumption at the person-type-level to mimic the information that is available for clothing.…”
Section: Data Sources and Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies find widely differing effects of gendered bargaining power on the shares of household budget spent on different goods. There is less evidence on the effects on food allocation to different household members, although women's bargaining power has been positively associated with women's food shares and dietary diversity in Bangladesh (D'Souza and Tandon, 2019;Rahman, 2012;Sraboni and Quisumbing, 2018), maternal dietary diversity and body-mass index in Nepal (Malapit et al, 2015), and better health outcomes in India (Calvi, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, there are substantial inequities in intrahousehold distribution of calories and nutrients in Bangladesh. Although in lower economic well‐being households, male heads consume disproportionately large shares of calories and nutrients, women's disempowerment is associated with lower calorie and nutrient intake, which may have direct consequences for their nutritional status (D'Souza & Tandon, 2019). It has been argued that female autonomy plays an important role in food access and food choice, nutritional status and health in Ghana (Amugsi, Lartey, Kimani, & Mberu, 2016), and schooling and voice with husband was correlated with dietary diversity in a study in Bangladesh (Sinharoy et al, 2018).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%