2016
DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1592461
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intralabyrinthine Schwannomas: Management and Hearing Rehabilitation with Cochlea Implants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
39
0
8

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
39
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, at least two of these patients had improved performance from their preoperative state, though still fell within the low-performance category. 28,29 Seven out of the 10 (70%) NF2 patients with open-set recognition reported had at least intermediate to high performance, compared with 5 out of 6 (83%) of those with sporadic tumors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In addition, at least two of these patients had improved performance from their preoperative state, though still fell within the low-performance category. 28,29 Seven out of the 10 (70%) NF2 patients with open-set recognition reported had at least intermediate to high performance, compared with 5 out of 6 (83%) of those with sporadic tumors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…29 This patient did not gain improvement in openset speech scores, but reportedly was very satisfied with her cochlear implant, uses it daily, and has improvement with the implant in conjunction with lip reading. The final subject in the low-performance category was reported by Plontke et al 28 Word recognition score using the German Freiburger monosyllable test in quiet at 65 dB preoperatively was 5% which improved modestly to 25% postoperatively.…”
Section: Low Performersmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Usually, patients might experience complete loss, which might occur acutely or progressively, balance problems (dizziness, vertigo, postural instability) or tinnitus [16]. Clinical diagnosis is usually made by ENT-specific examination, including ear microscopy, audiological assessment, neuro-otological diagnosis with testing of the semicircular canal and the otolith organs [16]. The former is classically completed by the gold standard high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%