1940
DOI: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1940.130.4.791
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intralumen Pressures of the Digestive Tract, Especially the Pyloric Region

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

1942
1942
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All 3 portions of the pyloric region were inhibited in a similar manner by duodenal distention, but stretching the other parts of the digestive tract was slightly less effective on the duodenal bulb than on the antrum or sphincter. with pressures of 5 to 15 mm., produced a slight increase in tone and motility of the sphincter region, similar to that previously reported (25,26). With higher pressures, up to 45 cm., an inhibition of the sphincter region frequently developed.…”
supporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All 3 portions of the pyloric region were inhibited in a similar manner by duodenal distention, but stretching the other parts of the digestive tract was slightly less effective on the duodenal bulb than on the antrum or sphincter. with pressures of 5 to 15 mm., produced a slight increase in tone and motility of the sphincter region, similar to that previously reported (25,26). With higher pressures, up to 45 cm., an inhibition of the sphincter region frequently developed.…”
supporting
confidence: 89%
“…Therefore, we determined (22 experiments), by the x-ray method, the effects of noxious bodily stimuli on gastric evacuation and on gastric and bulbar motility. We checked these observations by the simultaneous registration of the activity of the pyloric sphincter, as recorded with the pyloric diagraph (28), and by the accurate determination of the intralumen pressures in the antrum and bulb (25). Studies with the pyloric diagraph alone were also made (8 experiments) to provide rather direct information regarding sphincter activity (actually, the changes in the external (serosal) diameter of the sphincter), while the lumen of the sphincter region was free of foreign bodies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further errors may be introduced by using large balloons in an organ of irregular outlines (such as the stomach), where a symmetrical balloon may at one time be affected by the actual intraluminal pressure of the organ, while at other times it is compressed by the walls of the hollow viscus. Furthermore, as Quigley and his associates (6) have pointed out, the large balloons usually employed, whether elastic or of relatively fixed volume, do not measure intraluminal pressure, but merely indicate intestinal activity by changes in the volume or the pressure within the balloon.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hitherto, the mechanical activity of the gastroduodenal junction was only studied by recording intraluminal pressure (Wheelon & Thomas, 1922;Alvarez & Mahoney, 1923;Thomas & Crider, 1935;Meschan & Quigley, 1938;Brody, Werle, Meschan & Quigley, 1940;Carlson, Code & Nelson, 1966). Strain gauge transducers or induction coils were not yet used to study the correlation between pyloric and duodenal contractions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%