2013
DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20130426-16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intramedullary Nailing Versus Locked Plate for Treating Supracondylar Periprosthetic Femur Fractures

Abstract: The objective of this study was to compare retrograde intramedullary femoral nailing with supracondylar locked screw-plate fixation for the treatment of periprosthetic femur fractures following total knee arthroplasty. Time to union and full weight bearing were the primary study outcomes, with perioperative blood loss, need for transfusion, need for revision surgery, and infection being the secondary outcomes. A retrospective review of 63 patients who sustained Rorabeck Type II periprosthetic femoral fractures… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
36
3
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
36
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Nine articles, totaling 461 fractures, in our study directly compared locked plating and intramedullary nailing. Five articles found no overall advantage to either method, while three articles supported locked plating and one article favored nailing 5,7,13,16,19,20,30,35,41 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Nine articles, totaling 461 fractures, in our study directly compared locked plating and intramedullary nailing. Five articles found no overall advantage to either method, while three articles supported locked plating and one article favored nailing 5,7,13,16,19,20,30,35,41 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Internal fixation using submuscular plating has shown excellent results in several series. [24][25][26][27] Bezwada et al found retrograde intramedullary nails superior to plate and screw fixation while Large et al found locked plates superior to conventional plates. 6,24 Horneff et al found better union rates and lower reoperation rates with lateral locked plating compared with intramedullary nailing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…6,24 Horneff et al found better union rates and lower reoperation rates with lateral locked plating compared with intramedullary nailing. 26 Despite its advantages, locked plating resulted in malunion rate of 20% with an overall complication rate of 12%. 24 In another study, Streubel et al demonstrated comparable results when lateral locked plating was used for management of proximal (Su types 1 and 2) as well as extreme distal (Su type 3) periprosthetic fractures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Horneff et al [10] recommend the use of locking plated instead of intramedullary nails for the treatment of Rorabeck type II fractures because of the complications rate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%