2010
DOI: 10.3171/2010.6.focus10144
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intramedullary spinal cord cavernous malformations

Abstract: Although originally the subject of rare case reports, intramedullary spinal cord cavernous malformations (CMs) have recently surfaced in an increasing number of case series and natural history reports in the literature. The authors reviewed 27 publications with 352 patients to consolidate modern epidemiological, natural history, and clinical and surgical data to facilitate decision making when managing these challenging vascular malformations. The mean age at presentation was 42 years without a sex pre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
123
2
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(133 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
4
123
2
4
Order By: Relevance
“…10,16,25,33,52,66 By contrast, spinal cord cavernous malformations are very rare entities, accounting for 5%-12% of intraspinal vascular malformations. 14,24,29 In comparison with cavernous malformations within the cerebral hemispheres, those involving the spinal cord are thought to result in poorer outcomes. 10,33 Historically, cases of intramedullary spinal cord cavernous malformations (ISCCMs) have been infrequently reported and considered exceptionally rare.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10,16,25,33,52,66 By contrast, spinal cord cavernous malformations are very rare entities, accounting for 5%-12% of intraspinal vascular malformations. 14,24,29 In comparison with cavernous malformations within the cerebral hemispheres, those involving the spinal cord are thought to result in poorer outcomes. 10,33 Historically, cases of intramedullary spinal cord cavernous malformations (ISCCMs) have been infrequently reported and considered exceptionally rare.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondly, the patient presented with features of both a slow-progressive and acute neurological decline-a presenting pattern that is not commonly noted. In fact, of the 205 patients reviewed by Gross et al, variation in the rapidity of neurological decline within a single patient was not reported (6). Compared to the median duration of symptoms prior to admission (12 months) reported by Kivelev et al, our patient had a relatively shorter period of slow progression (6 months) followed by an acute neurological decline in the days prior to surgery (7).…”
Section: Case Presentationmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…This case is atypical for a number of reasons. Firstly, at 56 years of age, the patient was 14 years above the average age of presentation (42 years) based on the 27 series and 305 patients reviewed by Gross et al (6). Secondly, the patient presented with features of both a slow-progressive and acute neurological decline-a presenting pattern that is not commonly noted.…”
Section: Case Presentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations