2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.medine.2014.04.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intramuscular midazolam versus intravenous diazepam for treatment of seizures in the pediatric emergency department: A randomized clinical trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In all three studies, IM midazolam had a shorter interval to seizure cessation, but there was no significant difference in overall efficacy for termination of seizures (36,43,55).…”
Section: Pediatric Studiesmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In all three studies, IM midazolam had a shorter interval to seizure cessation, but there was no significant difference in overall efficacy for termination of seizures (36,43,55).…”
Section: Pediatric Studiesmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Intramuscular midazolam was compared with IV diazepam in three class III studies (36,43,55). In all three studies, IM midazolam had a shorter interval to seizure cessation, but there was no significant difference in overall efficacy for termination of seizures (36,43,55).…”
Section: Pediatric Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Prior studies compared different BZD types in terms of efficacy and routes of administration in pediatric acute seizures or SE. 18,[37][38][39] A study including 81 SE episodes showed that IV LZP and DZP were equally effective in stopping generalized seizures. 39 Moreover, a study evaluating LZP IV and DZP IV or PR demonstrated no difference between treatments regarding seizure cessation 40 ; however, patients with LZP IV required fewer doses to stop seizures than patients treated with DZP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%