1983
DOI: 10.2190/5x0n-twkj-ggy6-t10n
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intranasal Cocaine: Dose Relationships of Psychological Effects and Plasma Levels

Abstract: We compared the psychological effects of three doses of intranasal cocaine hydrochloride (.2, .75, and 1.5 mg/kg) with cocaine plasma concentrations in four volunteers. Intranasal lidocaine hydrochloride (.2 mg/kg) was used as a topically active placebo. Peak "high" ratings were related to both dose and peak plasma concentrations. At a given plasma concentration, "high" ratings were greater when plasma levels were increasing than when they were decreasing. This indicates that acute tolerance by tachphylaxis oc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This may have contributed to the more intense behavioral effects of the cocaine/ ethanol administration. The findings for intranasal cocaine alone administration in this study are similar to those of Wilkinson et al (1980), Jatlow (1988), and Jeffcoat et al (1989 with respect to its pharmacokinetics and to those of Van Dyke et al (1982), Fischman et al (1983), and Higgins et al (1990) with respect to time course of euphoria ("high"). The mechanism underlying the higher cocaine concentrations observed during cocaine/ethanol administration cannot be determined with certainty from this study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This may have contributed to the more intense behavioral effects of the cocaine/ ethanol administration. The findings for intranasal cocaine alone administration in this study are similar to those of Wilkinson et al (1980), Jatlow (1988), and Jeffcoat et al (1989 with respect to its pharmacokinetics and to those of Van Dyke et al (1982), Fischman et al (1983), and Higgins et al (1990) with respect to time course of euphoria ("high"). The mechanism underlying the higher cocaine concentrations observed during cocaine/ethanol administration cannot be determined with certainty from this study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…A series of measures designed to assess subjective drug effects were administered. Visual analog scales included the Self-Rated Analog Scale measuring "high", "rush", "sleepy", "pleasant", and "desire for cocaine" and a second subject-rated version of the High Scale which specifically assessed cocaine "high" (Van Dyke et al 1982). The "high" item on the Self-Rated Analog Scale asked subjects to rate the overall "high" state without regard to whether the "high" was more similar to that of cocaine or ethanol.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Visual analog scales (Fischman et al, 1993) consisted of lines anchored at 0 mm = minimal and 100 mm = maximal, measuring Any High, Rush, Sleepy, Paranoid, Sad, Depressed, Nervous, Crash, Desire for cocaine, and Feel Good (a measure of overall state of physical and mental well-being). A second subject-rated version of the High Scale, a single 100 mm line with 5 equidistant anchors characterizing the quality of the "Cocaine High" (Van Dyke, 1982), was also collected.…”
Section: Drug Administration Sessionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In both reports from individuals addicted to cocaine and human laboratory investigations (in which cocaine is administered to nonaddicted cocaine users), cocaine initially induces profound subjective well-being together with alertness (6,7,12,13). The fundamental effect of cocaine is the magnification of the intensity of almost all normal pleasures.…”
Section: The Clinical Characteristics Of Cocaine Addictionmentioning
confidence: 99%