2019
DOI: 10.1038/s41386-019-0368-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intranasal naloxone rapidly occupies brain mu-opioid receptors in human subjects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
42
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As noted in Fig 2, model simulations predicted that a fentanyl overdose exposure level of 25 ng/ml leads to 73% mu receptor occupancy by fentanyl without competition from naloxone. Administration of naloxone leads to rapid reduction in mu receptor occupancy by fentanyl due to competition by naloxone, as would be expected based on naloxone's fast appearance in brain [20,28], and the rapid dissociation rates of fentanyl and naloxone [29]. After administering a 2 mg IM of naloxone, mu receptor occupancy by fentanyl was predicted to decrease to 33% within ten minutes of naloxone being administered.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As noted in Fig 2, model simulations predicted that a fentanyl overdose exposure level of 25 ng/ml leads to 73% mu receptor occupancy by fentanyl without competition from naloxone. Administration of naloxone leads to rapid reduction in mu receptor occupancy by fentanyl due to competition by naloxone, as would be expected based on naloxone's fast appearance in brain [20,28], and the rapid dissociation rates of fentanyl and naloxone [29]. After administering a 2 mg IM of naloxone, mu receptor occupancy by fentanyl was predicted to decrease to 33% within ten minutes of naloxone being administered.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Because of non-specific binding, concentrations in the brain of fentanyl available for binding to mu receptor are difficult to measure experimentally. Published data for the relationship between naloxone dose and mu receptor occupancy [20], and between fentanyl dose, receptor occupancy, and pain relief [21][22][23] were used to infer brain exposures. For example, a fentanyl plasma level of 5 ng/ml is associated with pain relief [24], and pain relief is evident at mu receptor occupancy above 10% [25].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the 2 mg IV dose was associated with a C max plasma level of 38.7 ng/mL. A recent study in humans suggested that 1 mg and 2 mg IV NLX resulted in a mean RO of 54-82% and 71-96%, respectively [18]. The 1 mg and 2 mg IN doses of NLX in that study were associated with C max pharmacokinetic levels of 1.83 ng/mL and 4.33 ng/mL, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Absent a clear stoichiometric relationship between occupancy of μ-opioid receptors and plasma concentrations of either naltrexone or its principal metabolite, 6β-naltrexol, 39 additional studies will be required to determine how the shorter plasma half-life of naltrexone observed after intranasal administration affects μ-opioid receptor occupancy in the central nervous system, which is a critical factor contributing to the duration of action of a rescue agent. 16,42 Rabiner et al 39 have hypothesized that the metabolite 6β-naltrexol, a long residence time of both naltrexone and 6β-naltrexol on μ-opioid receptors, and the trapping of these compounds in brain parenchyma could contribute to the anomalously long occupancy of μ-opioid receptors following oral naltrexone. Despite a high affinity at μ-opioid receptors 39 and long plasma half-life following intranasal administration (Table 4), it is unlikely that 6β-naltrexol significantly contributes to the pharmacological effects of naltrexone in the central nervous system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Imaging studies using [ 11 C]carfentanil have demonstrated that oral naltrexone (50 mg) results in brain μ‐opioid receptor occupancy that is significantly longer (eg, ∼60% occupancy 23‐33 hours postdosing) than would be predicted from its plasma half‐life . By contrast, imaging studies in normal volunteers have demonstrated that occupation of μ‐opioid receptors following either intravenous or intranasal naloxone (t 1/2 , ∼2 hours) mirrors its plasma half‐life. Absent a clear stoichiometric relationship between occupancy of μ‐opioid receptors and plasma concentrations of either naltrexone or its principal metabolite, 6β‐naltrexol, additional studies will be required to determine how the shorter plasma half‐life of naltrexone observed after intranasal administration affects μ‐opioid receptor occupancy in the central nervous system, which is a critical factor contributing to the duration of action of a rescue agent .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%