The structure of the competitive network is an important driver of biodiversity and coexistence in natural communities. In addition to determining which species survive, the nature and intensity of competitive interactions within the network also affect the growth, productivity, and abundances of those individuals that persist. As such, the competitive network structure may likewise play an important role in determining community-level functioning by capturing the net costs of competition. Here, using an experimental system comprising 18 wood decay basidiomycete fungi, we test this possibility by quantifying the links among competitive network structure, species diversity, and community function. We show that species diversity alone has negligible impacts on community functioning, but that diversity interacts with two key properties of the competitive networkcompetitive intransitivity and average competitive ability-to ultimately shape biomass production, respiration, and carbon use efficiency. Most notably, highly intransitive communities comprising weak competitors exhibited a positive diversity-function relationship, whereas weakly intransitive communities comprising strong competitors exhibited a negative relationship. These findings demonstrate that competitive network structure can be an important determinant of community-level functioning, capturing a gradient from weakly to strongly competitive communities. Our research suggests that the competitive network may therefore act as a unifying link between diversity and function, providing key insight as to how and when losses in biodiversity will impact ecosystem function.competitive intransitivity | basidiomycete | interference | community assembly | ecosystem function T he relationship between biological diversity and ecosystem functioning is a central question in ecology and conservation, providing tangible links between natural systems and the provision of ecosystem services to humans. In recent decades, a wealth of studies have explored how ecosystem functioning responds to changes in various types of diversity (e.g., species, trait, or phylogenetic diversity), revealing the highly idiosyncratic nature of this relationship across systems (1). Functionally unique species with mutually exclusive resource requirements can exhibit greater productivity in diverse communities (2), whereas highly similar species with overlapping niches exhibit minimal increases in functioning as diversity increases (1, 3). Although the field of biodiversity-ecosystem function (BEF) research continues to gain momentum, the sheer complexity of ecological communities complicates the search for unifying patterns (1). As such, in most systems, we still lack the ability to predict a priori how changes in biodiversity will alter ecosystem function.The BEF relationship is often linked to the degree of functional redundancy, complementarity, or niche overlap among species (4-6). Yet this relationship can alternatively be formulated in terms of the nature, variability, and intensity of ...