2015
DOI: 10.1111/vop.12277
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intraocular localization ofOnchocerca lupiadult worm in a dog with anterior uveitis: A case report

Abstract: Intraocular onchocercosis should be included in the differential diagnosis of canine anterior uveitis in endemic areas. This case highlights the atypical localization of O. lupi in the canine eye emphasizing on the possibility for a complete cure after the surgical removal of the parasite and the filaricidal medication subsequently applied.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The zoonotic role of O. lupi was reported for the first time in 2011 [7] and, since then on, up to 18 patients have been diagnosed positive for this parasite, worldwide (i.e., Germany, Tunisia, Hungary, Greece, Turkey, Iran and USA) [18][19][20]. The diagnosis of canine onchocercosis is achieved by detection and identification of microfilariae (mfs) in small skin biopsies, an invasive procedure not often accepted by dog owners, mainly in absence of typical clinical lesions of the infection [21,22], and or based on the presence of ocular nodules on the eyelids, conjunctiva, and sclera of dogs [23,24]. However, the results of these procedures may be (false-) negative in the case of infections with immature or not reproducing worms and according to the day-time of the sampling, considering the circadian rhythm of mfs [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The zoonotic role of O. lupi was reported for the first time in 2011 [7] and, since then on, up to 18 patients have been diagnosed positive for this parasite, worldwide (i.e., Germany, Tunisia, Hungary, Greece, Turkey, Iran and USA) [18][19][20]. The diagnosis of canine onchocercosis is achieved by detection and identification of microfilariae (mfs) in small skin biopsies, an invasive procedure not often accepted by dog owners, mainly in absence of typical clinical lesions of the infection [21,22], and or based on the presence of ocular nodules on the eyelids, conjunctiva, and sclera of dogs [23,24]. However, the results of these procedures may be (false-) negative in the case of infections with immature or not reproducing worms and according to the day-time of the sampling, considering the circadian rhythm of mfs [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reports of O . lupi infection are mainly based on the presence of ocular nodules on the eyelids, conjunctiva, and sclera [ 3 , 21 , 22 ], though the localization of adult worms in the retrobulbar area of the canine patients may impair the assessment of its distribution in endemic areas [ 23 ]. The detection of microfilariae (mfs) in skin snip sediments is the only available tool for the diagnosis of the infection when nodules are not apparent in the eyes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Canine ocular onchocercosis is a parasitic disease that is being diagnosed with an increasing frequency in both the United States and Europe . The causative agent, Onchocerca lupi , is a filarial nematode that was originally isolated from a wolf in Russia in 1967 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%