2019
DOI: 10.1097/opx.0000000000001322
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intraocular Pressure Elevation during Lateral Body Posture in Side-sleeping Glaucoma Patients

Abstract: SIGNIFICANCE In side-sleeping open-angle glaucoma (OAG) patients, eyes that showed progression exhibited a greater intraocular pressure (IOP) elevation when subjects were rested in the lateral decubitus (LD) posture on the ipsilateral side compared with those eyes that did not progress. PURPOSE The purposes of this study were to investigate whether lying in the LD position for an extended period affects IOP in side-sleeping patients with OAG when rested… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in accordance with previous studies, that demonstrated LDP induced IOP increase of the lower eye in comparison to either sitting and/or supine postures in either healthy subjects 10,11,40 or untreated glaucoma patients 14,41 . The GLAIMP-group showed higher IOP fluctuations and rise than healthy subjects during postural change from sitting to LDP, which is in line with other studies that reported that higher LDP-or supineinduced IOP changes were associated with more progression or asymmetrical visual field defects of untreated and treated glaucoma patients 13,14,[42][43][44][45] ; however, others did not report a relationship of LDP-induced changes and glaucoma progression or laterality 15,46 . Our GLALE-group showed no significant IOP change during LDP vs sitting.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…This is in accordance with previous studies, that demonstrated LDP induced IOP increase of the lower eye in comparison to either sitting and/or supine postures in either healthy subjects 10,11,40 or untreated glaucoma patients 14,41 . The GLAIMP-group showed higher IOP fluctuations and rise than healthy subjects during postural change from sitting to LDP, which is in line with other studies that reported that higher LDP-or supineinduced IOP changes were associated with more progression or asymmetrical visual field defects of untreated and treated glaucoma patients 13,14,[42][43][44][45] ; however, others did not report a relationship of LDP-induced changes and glaucoma progression or laterality 15,46 . Our GLALE-group showed no significant IOP change during LDP vs sitting.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Continuous IOP measurement allows for the investigation of short-term fluctuations of IOP and its direct effect on RGC function during simultaneous PERG recordings: the robustness of steady-state PERG allowed simultaneous recording with the continuous IOP measurement due to its frequency-based amplitude extraction at 15 Hz that is dissociated from the sensor frequency intrusions at 9 Hz [ 59 ]. The LDP induced a significantly higher IOP in the lower eyes in accordance with other studies [ 61 , 62 ], in both glaucoma patients with the eyemate-IO sensor and healthy controls. The increased IOP was accompanied by reversible reductions of RGC responses determined via PERG both in controls and glaucomatous eyes.…”
Section: Mfvepsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The iCare has been designed to hold the probe to prevent dropping. To measure the IOP in the supine position and LDP, a soft pillow was placed under the head to maintain it parallel to the bed as has been previously described 5,7,11,19,20. For each position, 3 consecutive sets of measurements were taken (6 measurements for each set).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To measure the IOP in the supine position and LDP, a soft pillow was placed under the head to maintain it parallel to the bed as has been previously described. 5,7,11,19,20 For each position, 3 consecutive sets of measurements were taken (6 measurements for each set). The average values of each set were calculated automatically, and the mean values obtained for 3 consecutive sets of measurements in each position were used for the statistical analyses.…”
Section: Measurement Of Iopmentioning
confidence: 99%