A s r e p o r t e d i n t h e s t u d y t i t l e d " R o b o t i c v e r s u s thoracoscopic combined anatomic subsegmentectomy for early stage lung cancer: Early results of a cohort study", by Jian Z, Li C, Feng X et al.(1), it is safe and feasible for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients to be treated using combined anatomic subsegmentectomy via robot-assisted surgery (RATS) or video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS). The robotic approach may improve N1 and N2 lymph node retrieval.Currently, segmentectomy is widely used and many papers have reported that its long-term outcomes in peripheral small NSCLC tumors are similar to those of standard lobectomy (2,3). Notably, the phase III randomized trial, Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG) 0802/West Japan Clinical Oncology Group (WJOG) 4607L (JCOG0802/WJOG4607L), found that patients benefit more from segmentectomy than lobectomy in terms of overall survival. Thus, currently, segmentectomy can be considered to be the standard surgical intervention for peripheral small NSCLC tumors.However, segmentectomy seems to be more technically complex than lobectomy. Based on the safety results from trial JCOG0802/WJOG4067, most postoperative measures of intraoperative and postoperative complications do not differ between segmentectomy and lobectomy patients. However, the incidence of fistula/pulmonarylung (air leak) was 3.8% and 6.5% in patients in the lobectomy and segmentectomy arms, respectively (P=0.04).Multivariable analysis revealed that predictors of pulmonary complications, including air leak and empyema (grade ≥2) were complex in segmentectomy versus lobectomy (odds ratio: 2.07, 95% confidence interval: 1.11-3.88, P=0.023) (4). A l t h o u g h m o r e c o m p l i c a t i o n s w e r e e x p e c t e d i n subsegmentectomy, the authors observed only one (3.3%) and two (6.3%) air leak cases (grade ≥2) in RATS and VATS subsegmentectomy, respectively, indicating that for skilled surgeons, subsegmentectomy may be safe.Several recent studies indicate that RATS and VATS segmentectomy have similar perioperative outcomes (5-7). A meta-analysis of 18 studies involving 60,349 patients (RATS: 8,726, VATS: 51,623) found that most clinical parameters, including conversion rate, days to chest tube removal, postoperative hospitalization time, and in-hospital mortality did not differ significantly between RATS and VATS segmentectomy. However, although the operation time was longer, the incidence of postoperative complications was lower and more lymph nodes were retrieved in the RATS group. The authors' results are consistent with those of this meta-analysis.Based on my personal experience, I consider RATS to be more effective in segmentectomy because it offers three-dimensional vision, greater flexibility, and better assistance for surgeons, although it has disadvantages, such as unsatisfactory tactile feedback and higher cost.There are several fundamental steps for ensuring safe and secure subsegmentectomy in early NSCLC, which every thoracic surgeon should keep in m...