Among several techniques considered for surgical and endoscopic imaging, novel optical methods are evolving as a promising approach for interventional guidance. Pilot clinical applications of fluorescence molecular imaging have demonstrated the benefits of using targeted fluorescent agents in cancer surgery. This premise can be extended broadly to interventional guidance through an increasing number of targeted agents and detection techniques. Beyond epi-illumination fluorescence imaging, optoacoustic (photoacoustic) methods are emerging to offer high-resolution crosssectional optical imaging through several millimeters to centimeters of depth. We present an overview of key recent developments in optical interventional imaging and outline the potential for a paradigm shift in surgical and endoscopic visualization. Many imaging methods have been clinically introduced over the past 40 y, including CT, MR imaging, ultrasound, SPECT, and PET. Despite the wide contribution of these methods to whole-body imaging, their translation to surgical or endoscopic guidance remains challenging (1) because of their cost, size, use of ionizing radiation, or the need to enclose the patient to provide a tomographic image (2,3). Correspondingly, portable ultrasound endoscopic imaging (4) and intraoperative sentinel-node detection with g-ray imaging have been explored (5).Despite progress in medical imaging technology, clinical decision making in surgery and endoscopy still relies largely on the visual inspection or palpation of tissues. However, the human eye is not a particularly potent detector. It cannot visualize under the tissue surface, and its sensitivity is limited by the color contrast between healthy tissue and disease. These deficiencies of human vision limit the delineation of tumor margins during surgery or lead to high miss rates during white-light endoscopy, possibly compromising patient prognosis and efficient treatment (6,7).We briefly present here optical and optoacoustic methods emerging as alternatives to human vision for interventional imaging. Focus is given to technologies that we believe can potentially soon affect clinical outcomes, and key shortcomings that require attention are outlined.
IMAGING INTRINSIC CONTRASTOptical contrast in tissues has diverse origins. Typically, it arises from spatial variations of tissue constituents and tissue morphology, such as spatial changes in cellular density, the index of refraction, the biochemical composition of various tissues or vascularization, blood concentration, and oxygenation state (8). Humans can perceive this contrast only as superficial color differences and the corresponding patterns generated by color contrast. Accordingly, different optical imaging methods have been under consideration to better use optical contrast mechanisms and improve disease identification.Narrow-band imaging, for example, operates on illuminating tissue in the blue (415 nm) and green (540 nm) spectrum of light and obtains difference images that highlight subsurface blood vessels (9...