2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2006.07.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intraoperative local anaesthesia for paediatric postoperative oral surgery pain – a randomized controlled trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
13
3
Order By: Relevance
“…1,[44][45][46] Seventy percent of the cases received 2% lidocaine with 1 : 100,000 epinephrine given by infiltration with an anticipated duration of action in soft tissue of approximately 3 hours. The analysis performed used the highest FPS-R score within the first 12 hours after discharge overcoming the local anesthetic effect.…”
Section: Parental Satisfaction With Use Of Pain Assessment Toolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,[44][45][46] Seventy percent of the cases received 2% lidocaine with 1 : 100,000 epinephrine given by infiltration with an anticipated duration of action in soft tissue of approximately 3 hours. The analysis performed used the highest FPS-R score within the first 12 hours after discharge overcoming the local anesthetic effect.…”
Section: Parental Satisfaction With Use Of Pain Assessment Toolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the findings about the use of local anaesthesia for postoperative pain control are contradictory. Various authors such as Coulthard, McWilliams, and Townsend reported that local anaesthesia application did not affect postoperative pain scores [9, 15, 16]. However, Atan et al [2] defended the view that local anaesthesia application in the perioperative period was effective in controlling pain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In paediatric patients aged 12 or less requiring dental extractions, the use of local anaesthetic intra‐operatively has not been successful in significantly reducing post‐operative pain and distress. Randomised controlled studies have included the use of topical bupivacaine compared with saline 8 , the use of lidocaine with adrenaline infiltration compared with saline 2 and the use of intra‐ligamental lidocaine injection compared with standard treatment 9 . In this last study, a reduction in pain score was seen at 5 min post‐extraction, but this was not sustained, and the cumulative pain scores over the first hour showed no significant difference.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%