2010
DOI: 10.1097/mao.0b013e3181ec1b8c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intraoperative Neural Response Telemetry as a Predictor of Performance

Abstract: This study suggests that there is no significant correlation between intraoperative tNRT and speech perception performance at 1 year. At the time of surgery, tNRT provides valuable information regarding the electrical output of the implant and the response of the auditory system to electrical stimulation and preliminary device programming data; however, it is not a valuable predictor of postoperative performance. Furthermore, the absence of tNRT does not necessarily indicate a lack of stimulation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
60
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
60
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, only 27% of children with abnormal or absent ECAPs developed open‐set speech perception skills compared to 81% of children with robust results. Although most studies have not shown such an association, the utility of this tool in patients with suspect (or limited) neural populations, such as those with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder, has only recently been demonstrated 19, 20. In that study, no child with absent or abnormal ECAPs developed open‐set speech perception abilities 20.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Specifically, only 27% of children with abnormal or absent ECAPs developed open‐set speech perception skills compared to 81% of children with robust results. Although most studies have not shown such an association, the utility of this tool in patients with suspect (or limited) neural populations, such as those with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder, has only recently been demonstrated 19, 20. In that study, no child with absent or abnormal ECAPs developed open‐set speech perception abilities 20.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…After the removal of duplicates and screening of titles and abstracts, 143 remained. Evaluation of full texts yielded a total of 26 articles and cross‐referencing added one, resulting in a total of 27 relevant articles suitable for critical appraisal describing a relation between speech perception of cochlear implantees and characteristics of the recorded eCAPs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, results from other laboratories have been inconsistent enough that promontory or round window stimulation is not in common use. Similarly, CAPs evoked by electrical stimulation once the implant is in place have not produced consistent correlations with outcomes (36,37). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%