2017
DOI: 10.1093/bja/aew434
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intraoperative tranexamic acid use in major spine surgery in adults: a multicentre, randomized, placebo-controlled trial

Abstract: Abstract15 Background. Perioperative tranexamic AQ5 acid (TXA) use can reduce bleeding and transfusion requirements in several types of surgery, but level I evidence proving its effectiveness in major spine surgery is lacking. This study was designed to investigate the hypothesis that TXA reduces perioperative blood loss and transfusion requirements in patients undergoing major spine procedures. Methods. We conducted a multicentre, prospective, randomized double-blind clinical trial, comparing TXA with placebo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
56
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
2
56
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A recent multicenter, prospective randomized double-blind trial compared TxA with placebo in posterior instrumentation spine surgery (> 3 segmental fusions) for efficacy based on number of transfused units and perioperative blood loss. 74 There was significant reduction in the need for transfusion (42% in TxA vs. 67% in placebo group; p < 0.05) and intraoperative blood loss.…”
Section: Evidencementioning
confidence: 83%
“…A recent multicenter, prospective randomized double-blind trial compared TxA with placebo in posterior instrumentation spine surgery (> 3 segmental fusions) for efficacy based on number of transfused units and perioperative blood loss. 74 There was significant reduction in the need for transfusion (42% in TxA vs. 67% in placebo group; p < 0.05) and intraoperative blood loss.…”
Section: Evidencementioning
confidence: 83%
“…The full manuscripts were obtained and analyzed, and we ultimately selected 30 RCT studies [1645] with 2087 patients for the analysis using the pre-defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Of the 30 RCTs, 26 were 2-arm controlled trials comparing active intervention (4 RCTs of aprotinin, [40–42,45] 3 of EACA, [34,39,44] 9 of TXA1, [16,1820,22,23,32,35,37] 10 of TXA2 [17,21,24,25,2931,33,36,38] ) to placebo; 1 was a 2-arm trial comparing EACA to TXA2, [28] 3 were 3-arm trials (2 RCTs of TXA1 vs. EACA vs. placebo, [26,27,43] 1 was EACA vs. aprotinin vs. placebo [43] ). Figure 1 shows the flowchart for study selection process.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zunehmend bessere und sicherere perioperative Patientenführung, die maßgeblich mitbeteiligt ist an einer Reduktion perioperativer Komplikationen, werden zu einer weiteren Steigerung von Eingriffen führen, die derzeit noch aufgrund des interventionsspezifischen Risikopotenzials als kritisch angesehen werden. Erwähnt seien hierbei zu erwartende Fortschritte im Bereich der Thromboembolieund Infektionsprophylaxe oder aber auch Verbesserungen im Bereich der Hämostase mit deutlich reduziertem perioperativem Blutverlust [9,10].…”
Section: Interdisziplinärer Fortschrittunclassified