2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2018.01.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intraorbital hemorrhage following a secondary intervention at integrated zygomatic implants: A case report

Abstract: HighlightsZygomatic implant placement may have severe complications.Case reports about a complication during secondary, corrective surgery.Intraorbital hemorrhage caused an orbital compression syndrome.Emergency surgery was necessary to resolve the compression.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, different anatomical structures adjacent to the zygomatic bone, such as the orbit, can be damaged during zygomatic implant placement [ 21 ]. Severe pain of the eye and diffused swelling of the upper and lower eyelid were reported by Van Camp et al [ 25 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In fact, different anatomical structures adjacent to the zygomatic bone, such as the orbit, can be damaged during zygomatic implant placement [ 21 ]. Severe pain of the eye and diffused swelling of the upper and lower eyelid were reported by Van Camp et al [ 25 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…After implant placement, the apex is located between the orbit anteriorly and the dermis of the face laterally. These two areas are susceptible to different complications such as orbit invasion, although very rare, has been described by various authors [ 25 , 26 ], or dermis perforation, which could cause cutaneous fistulas [ 27 ]. For these reasons, the posterior area was where we observed most of the variations, because it is the zone that offers more manoeuvring possibilities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the absence of bone tissue in zones 1, 2 and 3 of the maxilla, the placement of 4 zygomatic implants is performed [ 10 ]. In spite of being a safe technique and well documented in the literature, it requires more experience of the surgeon, with increase in surgical risks [ 1 , 4 , 5 ]. An experienced surgeon perforated the orbital cavity in an attempt to place the second zygomatic implant, and reported only a hematoma in the orbit in the post-operative period [ 4 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In spite the technique being a predictable and well documented in the literature, in the above-mentioned cases, a higher degree of experience of the surgeon is demanded. Moreover, there is increased surgical risk due to the apex of the second zygomatic implant being anchored close to the orbit [ [3] , [4] , [5] ]. Indication of the placement of 4 zygomatic implants also has limitation when the infraorbital foramen is within the trajectory of the zygomatic implant, dimension of the zygomatic bone is insufficient for anchorage of 2 zygomatic implants, and there is accentuated facial concavity of the patient between the zygomatic bone, maxillary sinus and alveolar ridge (ZAGA 3 e 4), making it unfeasible to place a zygomatic implant, due to the risk of dehiscense of the tissue and exposure of the implant body [ [6] , [7] , [8] ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%