2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2005.10.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intraorganizational information and communication technology diffusion: Implications for industrial sellers and buyers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 112 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In many instances, demand uncertainty has either a negative or even no influence on a technology decision [83], making a hypothesis difficult to draw. However, given that tracking technology can provide more data in an uncertain environment than any previously evaluated technology, allowing for a potentially significant reduction in transaction costs, we expect that it will have an influence at all three stages of assimilation.…”
Section: Demand Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many instances, demand uncertainty has either a negative or even no influence on a technology decision [83], making a hypothesis difficult to draw. However, given that tracking technology can provide more data in an uncertain environment than any previously evaluated technology, allowing for a potentially significant reduction in transaction costs, we expect that it will have an influence at all three stages of assimilation.…”
Section: Demand Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several research studies showed benefits from using information and communication technology (ICT) such as CRM, ERP and Intranet, which is considered significant for creating competitive advantage (Jaworski and Kohli 1993;McKee, Varadarajan and Pride 1989;Papastathopoulou, Avlonitis and Panagopoulos, 2007;Yu et al, 2015). It can be imperative in reducing uncertainties surrounding production and administration processes (Dewett and Jones, 2001) and significant determinant of technical performance and productivity of R&D project teams (Allen 1984;Pelz and Andrew 1966).…”
Section: Ict Innovation Diffusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is not possible to understand the contribution of such use in the whole process of building value to clients. Most studies on the use of ICT tools made outside Brazil focus only in some components of this process: i) cost reduction (Kaufmann and Carter, 2004;Barwise and Farley, 2005;Song and Zahedi, 2006;Long, Tellefsen and Lichtenthal, 2007;Michael, 2007;Rao, Senecal and Le, 2007;Tao., Chen and Chang, 2007;Kotabe, Mol and Murray, 2008;Samiee, 2008;Walters, 2008;Wu and Hisa, 2008); ii) information quality and speed (Ahearne, Jelinek and Rapp, 2005;Bush, Moore and Rocco, 2005;Honeycutt Jr, 2005;Papastathopouloua, Avlonitisb, and Panagopoulosc, 2007;Basu and Muylle, 2007;King and Burgess, 2008;Samiee, 2008); iii) productivity raise, efficiency and effectiveness of the commercial team (Bush et al, 2005;Buehrer, Senecal and Pullins, 2005;Schillewaerta, Ahearneb, Frambachc and Moenaertd, 2005;Ahearne et al, 2005;Honeycutt Jr, 2005;Long et al, 2007;Richards and Jones, 2008;Stein and Smith, 2009). Only two studies look at the whole process of construction of value to the Client (Long et al, 2007;Stein and Smith, 2009) and four address the issue from the point of view of the client instead of from the internal point of view of the supplier company (Celuch and Goodwin;Taylor, 2007;Marwaha and Willmott, 2006;Rao et al, 2007;Tao, Chen and Chang, 2007).…”
Section: Ict and Value To Clientsmentioning
confidence: 99%