2020
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1710342
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intrapancreatic Accessory Spleen Masquerading as a Pancreatic Mucinous Neoplasm

Abstract: AbstractIncidentally discovered pancreatic cysts have become more common with increasing use of abdominal cross-sectional imaging. Tools that help us to better risk stratify a pancreatic cyst include advanced imaging techniques, such as pancreatic protocol computed tomography (CT) scan or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with cholangiopancreatography. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and fine-needle aspiration (FNA) are invasive measures to better define and sample cysts especially … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is difficult to diagnose ECIPAS preoperatively using conventional imaging, thus it is commonly misdiagnosed as another cystic neoplasm, such as a mucinous cystic neoplasm (MCN), solid pseudopapillary tumor (SPT), intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN), or cystadenocarcinoma. [6][7][8][9] ECIPAS was thought to be benign until recently when it was found to develop into a malignant tumor during 6-years follow-up, [10] which highlights its malignant potential. Thus, it would be necessary to make a definitive diagnosis of this disease as well as to differentiate it from other potentially malignant pancreatic tail cystic neoplasms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is difficult to diagnose ECIPAS preoperatively using conventional imaging, thus it is commonly misdiagnosed as another cystic neoplasm, such as a mucinous cystic neoplasm (MCN), solid pseudopapillary tumor (SPT), intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN), or cystadenocarcinoma. [6][7][8][9] ECIPAS was thought to be benign until recently when it was found to develop into a malignant tumor during 6-years follow-up, [10] which highlights its malignant potential. Thus, it would be necessary to make a definitive diagnosis of this disease as well as to differentiate it from other potentially malignant pancreatic tail cystic neoplasms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ECIPAS should therefore be considered in the differential diagnosis of pancreatic tail cystic lesions. It is difficult to diagnose ECIPAS preoperatively using conventional imaging, thus it is commonly misdiagnosed as another cystic neoplasm, such as a mucinous cystic neoplasm (MCN), solid pseudopapillary tumor (SPT), intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN), or cystadenocarcinoma [6–9] . ECIPAS was thought to be benign until recently when it was found to develop into a malignant tumor during 6-years follow-up, [10] which highlights its malignant potential.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ECIPAS should therefore be considered in the differential diagnosis of pancreatic tail cystic lesions. It is di cult to diagnose ECIPAS preoperatively using conventional imaging, thus it is commonly misdiagnosed as another cystic neoplasm, such as a mucinous cystic neoplasm (MCN), solid pseudopapillary tumor (SPT), intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) or cystadenocarcinoma [6][7][8][9]. ECIPAS was thought to be benign until recently when it was found to develop into a malignant tumor during 6-years follow-up [10], which highlights its malignant potential.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%