2010
DOI: 10.5194/npg-17-513-2010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intraplate seismicity in Canada: a graph theoretic approach to data analysis and interpretation

Abstract: Abstract. Intraplate seismicity occurs in central and northern Canada, but the underlying origin and dynamics remain poorly understood. Here, we apply a graph theoretic approach to characterize the statistical structure of spatiotemporal clustering exhibited by intraplate seismicity, a direct consequence of the underlying nonlinear dynamics. Using a recently proposed definition of "recurrences" based on record breaking processes (Davidsen et al., 2006 , with attributes drawn from the location, origin time and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
(105 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Numerous clustering methods have been applied to microseismic data. Some examples include waveform analysis (Moriya et al, 2005;Skoumal et al, 2015;Tezuka & Niitsuma, 2000), matched-filtering (Caffagni et al, 2016;Eaton & Caffagni, 2015), principal component analysis (PCA) with graph theory (Vasudevan et al, 2010), the k-means algorithm (Eaton et al, 2014), and density-based clustering (Cesca et al, 2013). Unsupervised machine learning techniques have also been applied for automated microseismic data arrival picking (Chen, 2018a) and fast waveform detection in microseismic imaging problems (Chen, 2018b).…”
Section: Research Lettermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous clustering methods have been applied to microseismic data. Some examples include waveform analysis (Moriya et al, 2005;Skoumal et al, 2015;Tezuka & Niitsuma, 2000), matched-filtering (Caffagni et al, 2016;Eaton & Caffagni, 2015), principal component analysis (PCA) with graph theory (Vasudevan et al, 2010), the k-means algorithm (Eaton et al, 2014), and density-based clustering (Cesca et al, 2013). Unsupervised machine learning techniques have also been applied for automated microseismic data arrival picking (Chen, 2018a) and fast waveform detection in microseismic imaging problems (Chen, 2018b).…”
Section: Research Lettermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The HuBLE‐network contains 38 broadband seismometers (primarily Guralp CMG‐3T, CMG‐ESP). The increased station coverage around Hudson Bay has led to a reduction in magnitude detection threshold in the middle of Hudson Bay from M w = 3.5 to M w = 2.5 (Vasudevan et al 2010). Earthquakes with lower magnitudes are observable close to the stations and are found in the northern part of Hudson Bay.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This defines an element in the earthquake sequence. A continued sequence of events is represented as a directed graph (Vasudevan et al, 2010;Vasudevan and Cavers, 2014b) with the vertices representing the earthquakes (and their attributes) and the arcs the connecting links between neighbors in a sequence. Figures 2a and 3a show the transition matrices for the directed graphs of the two grids, 128 × 128 and 1024 × 1024 grids.…”
Section: Building the Directed Graphmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cavers and Vasudevan (2015) have incorporated the spatio-temporal complexity of the earthquake recurrences (Davidsen et al, 2008;Vasudevan et al, 2010) into their Markov chain model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%