2003
DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkg262
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intrapulmonary penetration of linezolid

Abstract: The MIC90 (< or =4 mg/L) of linezolid for Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pneumoniae was exceeded in serum and bronchial mucosa in all subjects, in epithelial lining fluid in nine subjects and in macrophages in six subjects.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
39
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
3
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Linezolid MIC values (range, 0.12-0.5 mg/L) of the tested strains were well below linezolid concentrations that can be attained in serum (13.4 mg/L), alveolar macrophages (8.1 mg/L) and epithelial lining fluid (25.1 mg/L) using standard doses [13][14][15].…”
Section: Susceptibility Of M Tuberculosis and Pharmacokinetic Valuesmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Linezolid MIC values (range, 0.12-0.5 mg/L) of the tested strains were well below linezolid concentrations that can be attained in serum (13.4 mg/L), alveolar macrophages (8.1 mg/L) and epithelial lining fluid (25.1 mg/L) using standard doses [13][14][15].…”
Section: Susceptibility Of M Tuberculosis and Pharmacokinetic Valuesmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Results obtained using two different methods, the standard agar proportion method in 7H10 medium and the ESP Culture System II, were compared [11,12]. Susceptibility test results were compared with previously published linezolid pharmacokinetic data [13][14][15]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional population-based studies are needed to determine whether a difference truly exists. However, there are theoretical reasons to believe that agents such as linezolid or clindamycin may have an additional benefit because they are associated with less toxin release [106] and attain good concentrations in the lung parenchyma [107,108]. Both clindamycin and linezolid markedly suppress PVL production as staphylococci approach the stationary phase, and there may be no PVL detectable 12 h after starting treatment [109].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, recently a surge has been seen in the number of invasive diseases caused by CA-MRSA such as septic arthritis, septic shock, osteomyelitis, and pneumonia [11,14]. Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL) has been blamed for the invasive capability of CA-MRSA resulting in severe pneumonia, including necrotizing pneumonia.…”
Section: Invasivenessmentioning
confidence: 99%