1986
DOI: 10.2134/agronj1986.00021962007800020013x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intraraceme Competition in Field‐Grown Soybean1

Abstract: Abscission probability for positions within a soybean [Glycine max(L.) Merr.] raceme may not be equal. The influence of the two most proximal pods on abscission probability and growth of remaining pods within a raceme was studied using the soybean cultivar ‘Williams’. Plants were field grown (1982, Beltsville silt loam, Typic Fragiudult; 1983, Mattapeake silt loam, Typic Hapludult). Treatment consisted of removing or not removing the two most proximal (raceme Positions 1 and 2) pods. More flowers were produced… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0
2

Year Published

1990
1990
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
3
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Egli & Bruening (2002) hypothesized that competition for assimilate from early developing pods is a main factor in flower and pod abortion. This is based on their findings that flowering in soybean follows a bi‐modal distribution, with 100% pod survival in the first cohort and <60% in the second, which is consistent with previous reports (Huff & Dybing 1980; Spollen, Wiebold & Glenn 1986). The asynchronous and extended duration (>30 days) of flowering in soybean was identified as a possible cause of late‐flower abortion, as the large sink strength of fast‐growing pods that were initiated early would demand preference for available photoassimilate and lead to shedding of less‐developed pods.…”
Section: Targets For Altering Soybean Metabolism That Hold the Potentsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Egli & Bruening (2002) hypothesized that competition for assimilate from early developing pods is a main factor in flower and pod abortion. This is based on their findings that flowering in soybean follows a bi‐modal distribution, with 100% pod survival in the first cohort and <60% in the second, which is consistent with previous reports (Huff & Dybing 1980; Spollen, Wiebold & Glenn 1986). The asynchronous and extended duration (>30 days) of flowering in soybean was identified as a possible cause of late‐flower abortion, as the large sink strength of fast‐growing pods that were initiated early would demand preference for available photoassimilate and lead to shedding of less‐developed pods.…”
Section: Targets For Altering Soybean Metabolism That Hold the Potentsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The magnitude of abortion varies with the position on the plant, being greater in the branches, the lower part of the main stem and the top nodes of the main stem (Hansen and Shibles, 1978; Wiebold et al, 1981; Gai et al, 1984; Heindl and Brun, 1984). Within individual racemes, the proximal positions exhibit a higher pod‐set percentage than do the distal positions (Huff and Dybing, 1980; Dybing et al, 1986; Spollen et al, 1986a; Carlson et al, 1987; Wiebold, 1990; Wiebold and Panciera, 1990; Kokubun and Honda, 2000). The physiological mechanism controlling reproductive abortion, however, remains unclear.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is thought that ABA may stimulate the increased production of invertase resulting in more glucose for the growing pod. Conversely, Spollen et al (1986) found no changes in ABA levels when pod survival was increased in distal pods of a raceme, by the removal of proximal pods.…”
Section: Hormone Theorymentioning
confidence: 74%