How these subjective feelings of giving way affect actual functional performance or sport participation remains an area of debate. While it seems inherent that those with FAI will have "functional" deficits, this has not been consistently reported in the literature.Developed with the intentions of tracking rehabilitation and determining return-to-play criteria, functional performance testing provides an unbiased means of measuring functional ability.
10Most of the research on functional performance testing relates to the knee and, more specifically, to testing individuals with anterior cruciate ligament-deficient and reconstructed knees. 4,12,16,20,[24][25][26]28,29,34,37 Functional performance tests range from general lower extremity tests to unilateral hopping tests. 1,2,4,6,12,[16][17][18]20,22,24,[29][30][31][32][33]37 Limited studies exist evaluating the presence of functional deficits in patients with FAI. 7,9,10,21,27,39 Even with the small amount of research available, the studies present with conflicting results, adding to the confusion regarding the nature of this condition. Studies that used general lower extremity tests, such as the 6-meter shuttle run 9,27 and cocontraction test, 9 found no performance deficits in participants with FAI. Of 6 studies that used unilateral L ateral ankle sprains, which are primarily caused by an inversion stress to the joint, account for 34% of all injuries in athletics. 13 Additionally, up to 40% of individuals report a sense of instability after an initial sprain that may lead to recurrent instability. 15 Functional ankle instability (FAI) is described as a feeling of "giving way" in the ankle joint, [8][9][10][11]15,19,35 which may or may not occur in the presence of laxity of the lateral ligaments. 8,19,21,27 t StuDy DeSign: Experimental laboratory testing using a cross-sectional design. t MethoDS: Sixty college students volunteered for this study. Thirty participants with unilateral ankle instability were placed in the FAI group and 30 participants with no history of ankle injuries were placed in the control group. The FAI group was subsequently further divided to indicate those that reported giving way during the functional test (FAI-GW) and those that did not (FAI-NGW). Time to complete each test was recorded and the mean of 3 trials for each test were used for statistical analysis. To identify performance differences, we used 4 mixed-design 2-way (side-by-group) ANOVAs, 1 for each hop test. A Tukey post hoc test was completed on all significant findings.t reSuLtS: We identified a significant side-bygroup interaction for all 4 functional performance tests (P.05). Specifically, for each functional performance test, the FAI limb performed significantly worse than the contralateral uninjured limb in the FAI-GW group. Additionally, the FAI limb in the FAI-GW group performed worse than the FAI limb in the FAI-NGW group, and the matched limb in the control group in 3 of the 4 functional performance tests.t ConCLuSion: We found that functional performance deficits wer...