“…The latter has been explained as a consequence of the high variability of the renal nerves and ganglia (Tzafriri et al, ), variations in the renal arteries (Rimoldi et al, ; Okada et al, ), or aberrant reinnervation by sympathetic fibers post‐ablation (Booth et al, ). Several recent studies that support catheter‐based renal denervation techniques have used immunohistochemical methods to describe the location and density of nervous fibers around the renal artery (Atherton et al, ; Tellez et al, ; Sakakura et al, ) and its segmental branches (Lusch et al, ).However, none of these studies considered this information in the context of the classical descriptions of the sympathetic renal innervation (Legueu and Flandrin, ; Petit‐Dutaillis and Flandrin, ; Hovelacque, ; Testut, ; Delmas et al, ; Mitchell, ; Mitchell, ), nor did they include detailed anatomical descriptions of the renal plexus and vessels, including their anatomical relationships and variations.…”