1998
DOI: 10.1006/anbo.1998.0725
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intraspecific Variation in Genome Size: A Critical Reassessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

10
150
0
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 201 publications
(163 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
10
150
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Our data on nuclear DNA content in L. serriola, with such limited variation among 10 samples, tend to support the view of Greilhuber (1998).…”
Section: Dna Content Variation In L Serriolasupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our data on nuclear DNA content in L. serriola, with such limited variation among 10 samples, tend to support the view of Greilhuber (1998).…”
Section: Dna Content Variation In L Serriolasupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Although some works confirm the existence of noticeable intraspecific variability in the content of nuclear DNA (Ohri, 1998), other authors consider nuclear DNA content as a species-specific character (Greilhuber, 1998). Our data on nuclear DNA content in L. serriola, with such limited variation among 10 samples, tend to support the view of Greilhuber (1998).…”
Section: Dna Content Variation In L Serriolasupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Genome size has been demonstrated to often vary a factor 1.5-3 between taxa with identical chromosome numbers (Ohri 1998;Yokoya et al 2000;Zonneveld 2001;Zonneveld and van Iren 2001;Ellul et al 2002;Zonneveld et al 2003a, b;Hirsch et al 2004: Albach andGreilhuber 2004;Zonneveld and Duncan 2006). Moreover, Greilhuber (1998Greilhuber ( , 2005 has clearly shown that intraspecific variation of genome size is much less than assumed. The evolution of genome size (Cx-value, Greilhuber 1979) has received increased attention during recent years (Bennett and Leitch 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the accurate amount of nuclear DNA content is extremely important to understand the hereditary constituent of an organism, flow cytometry, originally developed for medical studies, is an easy, rapid, accurate and convenient tool for estimating plant genome size, ploidy level, assessing DNA content and analyzing the cell cycle (Greilhuber, 1998;Winkelmann et al, 1998). Datta and Naug (1968) Voluminous information on the nuclear DNA contents in plants is being published by Bennett et al (2000) and Hanson et al (2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%